In response to:

Why Gay Is Not the New Black

rebcon Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:27 PM
Maybe gays are better characterized as the new Jews, given the call of Baptist Pastor Charles Worley for concentration camps for gay until they die out.
Bill1895 Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:43 PM
I would not slur the Jewish people like that and just being a homosexual would not be a reason to lock up anyone.

Homosexuals who rape or molest or break other laws belong in prison.
Patriot155 Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:31 PM
I don't think the Jewish population would be too happy with that tag either.

Why can't we just call homosexuality what it is and let it stay what it is instead of trying to make it "normal" or illegal to criticize? I guarantee you that that's exactly what they are pushing for wheather they admitt it or not.
GOPjokeparty Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:34 PM
I dont see why you need to criticize it
rebcon Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:38 PM
You'd be upset too if people were calling for you to be put in concentraiton camps. Anyone who isn't outraged by Pastor Worley's remarks is unamerican and morally ocmpromised.

Reasonable people already call homosexuality what it is - a trait, that is morally neutral. People who haven't come to that understanding yet and try to prevent legal equality are deserving of social censure.
Patriot155 Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:39 PM
It all depends on what you would call criticism.

Calling it immoral, destructive to society and the fact that two dads and moms, adds one more strike to the many that kids have against them these days could be called criticism. In fact, that kind of criticism can get you suspended from school or fired in some cases.

Look at what they tried to do to Manning Parquaio.
Patriot155 Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:42 PM
They "say" he got crucified by the press because he tried to justify killing gays.

What a pathetic effort to demonize Christians and sell the victimhood of gays.

All he did, was quote a bible verse. So, what next, the bible is going to be called "hate speech".

Maybe I shouldn't ask that in such a loud voice, because I'm sure that's the next move from the left.
Patriot155 Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:43 PM
I'm sorry, I disagree with you there.

People, regardless of how much in disagreement the main stream is with their message, have the right to free speech.
Bill1895 Wrote: May 22, 2012 2:44 PM
"a trait, that is morally neutral. People who haven't come to that understanding yet and try to prevent legal equality are deserving of social censure."

Homosexuals already have legal equality with hetrosexuals in the USA.
DCM in FL Wrote: May 22, 2012 3:34 PM
"Reasonable people already call homosexuality what it is - a trait, that is morally neutral."

You can call it that all you want. You could also say that reasonable people call pedophilia "morally neutral" and it would be just as convincing (i.e., not at all).
nawlins72 Wrote: May 22, 2012 3:42 PM
"You'd be upset too if people were calling for you to be put in concentraiton camps. Anyone who isn't outraged by Pastor Worley's remarks is unamerican and morally ocmpromised."

Morally compromised? Yes. Un-American? No. It's a very common human trait regardless of nationality.
nawlins72 Wrote: May 22, 2012 3:42 PM
"You'd be upset too if people were calling for you to be put in concentraiton camps. Anyone who isn't outraged by Pastor Worley's remarks is unamerican and morally ocmpromised."

Morally compromised? Yes. Un-American? No. It's a very common human trait regardless of nationality.
Jay Wye Wrote: May 22, 2012 6:59 PM
because homosexuality is unhealthy and destructive behavior that is BAD for society.
that's been recognized for several thousand years of human existence.
it spreads disease,at much higher rates than than normal people.
Jay Wye Wrote: May 22, 2012 7:02 PM
it's called QUARANTINE,and would have been appropriate (as with any other dangerous communicable disease) when AIDS was first recognized. it's too late now.

Repeating what has been a rallying cry of gay activism for years, the cover of the December 16, 2008 issue of The Advocate announced, “Gay is the New Black: The Last Great Civil Rights Struggle.” Last week, on May 19th, headlines across the nation announced, “NAACP endorses gay marriage as ‘civil right.’” So, is gay the new black?

There are prominent black leaders who say yes, including Congressman John Lewis, who was active in the early Civil Rights movement. There are other prominent black leaders who say no, like Timothy F. Johnson, founder and president of the Frederick Douglass Foundation.

For...