In response to:

How the Media Distorts a Romney Quote

ReaganConservativeGuy Wrote: Sep 16, 2012 2:42 PM
Thanks for the response. I understand what you're saying, but I was questioning Kevin Glass's assertion that "Romney's statement obviously includes a lower bound that he should not have left unspecified - but it's quite clear that he thinks a $200k/year range is the upper limit." How is that clear? And what did Romney mean when he said, No, 100K is not a middle class income? Is it a lower class income?
Yesterday, Mitt Romney gave an interview on Good Morning America in which he defended his tax plan from conjecture that it would force him to raise taxes on middle-income Americans. In responding to interviewer George Stephanopoulos, Romney said,

"No one can say my plan is going to raise taxes on middle-income people, because principle number one is (to) keep the burden down on middle-income taxpayers... No, middle income is $200,000 to $250,000 and less."

The left-wing media sniffed out a storyline: by dropping the last two words from that statement, it looks like Mitt Romney thinks that...