1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Barack Hussein Alinsky

RCMinor Wrote: Feb 22, 2011 12:44 PM
Ask Jesse Jackson if he thinks "race matters" or not. It sure matters to him, he's made himself a cool few million off cheap race hustling.
In response to:

Barack Hussein Alinsky

RCMinor Wrote: Feb 22, 2011 12:42 PM
Possibly, it does seem a bit incoherent.
In response to:

Barack Hussein Alinsky

RCMinor Wrote: Feb 22, 2011 12:41 PM
You mean he's using the Grecian formula?
In response to:

Barack Hussein Alinsky

RCMinor Wrote: Feb 22, 2011 12:40 PM
"Alinskyite" is now a derogatory term? Better call it "racist too, just to be safe. Don't forget, speaking Dear Leader's middle name aloud is also racist. You stupid (untrag.
In response to:

Barack Hussein Alinsky

RCMinor Wrote: Feb 22, 2011 12:38 PM
Thats right oracle, tell it like it is! The Chews run everything, right??? From Wall Street to Hollywood, from sea to shining sea! Tel Aviv runs DC! Cut loose and give 'em both barrels! Here, put on this sweater. Your brown shirt is showing.
In response to:

The Privatization of the First Amendment

RCMinor Wrote: Dec 10, 2009 2:44 PM
Also Terry, you are aware of the Articles of Confederation? They were abandoned precisely because they left the individual states too much at loose ends. The Const. was crafted specifically to create a stronger central [federal] government.
In response to:

The Privatization of the First Amendment

RCMinor Wrote: Dec 10, 2009 2:23 PM
Although I think we are basically on the same side of the issue here, I have to point out that you are making some very basic errors.

First, the Bill of Rights does very clearly spell out specific rights which are Constitutionally protected. It is often said that the Const. is not =granting= those rights, it is defining them as already existing and protected. I'm not sure if that's what you are trying to say with "you cannot accept the notion that we have "Constitutionally Protected" rights." We certainly do. Amendments 1 - 10 are the most important and explicit, but that's not all of 'em by any means.

Second, the Supreme Court is indisputibly the final arbiter of what any law, including any part of the Constitution,...
In response to:

Obama's Fantasy Jobs Plan

RCMinor Wrote: Dec 10, 2009 2:03 PM
"There isn't a conservative alive who wants to see Obama actually find a way to create more jobs. ...
You guys are so transparent, can't you find a more honest way to make a living, one that actually contributes to our society?"


That's a riot. We have a way. You call it corporate fascism. We call it free enterprise.

Hint: this does NOT include taking fifty dollars from my paycheck and giving thirty-five of it to an undereducated hippie to sweep the sidewalk in front of my house. The other fifteen? Oh, ten went to the bureacrat who "created this job", and five went to the bureacrat's brother, who owns the store that sells 75 cent brooms for $4.95.

The other 5 cents? Dunno, musta got spent foolishly somewhere.
In response to:

Obama's Fantasy Jobs Plan

RCMinor Wrote: Dec 10, 2009 1:55 PM
Have =you= ever really listened to what President Sock Puppet wants to do?

The policies he is advancing are absolutely ruinous. I'm sure he thinks he is doing the right thing -- nobody =thinks= they are evil. Even Hitler thought he was on God's side.

I think he either just does not fully understand that sooner or later, the credit card has to get paid off, or he is, as others suggest, deliberately engineering a situation which will enable him to seize extraordinary powers and effect fundamental change to what this nation is meant to be.

["Oh! Oh! Who says what this country is supposed to be!" I'm sure that's the knee-jerk reaction. Try reading the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to get an idea...
In response to:

How to Create Jobs Without Really Trying

RCMinor Wrote: Dec 10, 2009 1:29 PM
" I have found that when you scratch the surface of a liberal, you find pettiness and jealousy."

Or worse. "Progressives" talk a great game of compassion and caring in the abstract, but dam little for any one particular individual, except when one is handy for a photo op.

Or worst of all. Look how the homicidal maniac Che Guevara has been turned into such a liberal ikon, and the airplay his profound observation about being motivated by love.

"Love" didn't make much difference to the several thousand men women and children who died at a bullet-ridden at his command. It didn't make much difference to the score or so who died directly at his hand -- mostly teenage boys, bound, gagged, beaten senseless, then dropped...
1 - 10 Next