In response to:

The Fallacy of Redistribution

rchuang1654 Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 1:02 AM
We already have seen what "redistribution" can do to a country: ask any Chinese old enough to remember what happened during the "Great Leap Forward" when that policy resulted in (by some estimates) 34 million Chinese starving to death between 1958 and 1961. That's almost three and a half times the number of people killed by the Nazi government between 1933 and 1945.
WodenofAzgard Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 1:16 AM
Seems like more of a failure to redistribute.
jmg11 Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 1:48 AM
Redistribution is always and everywhere a failure, as any troll can see.

You have come here long enough, you should know by now.
The recently discovered tape on which Barack Obama said back in 1998 that he believes in redistribution is not really news. He said the same thing to Joe the Plumber four years ago. But the surfacing of this tape may serve a useful purpose if it gets people to thinking about what the consequences of redistribution are.

Those who talk glibly about redistribution often act as if people are just inert objects that can be placed here and there, like pieces on a chess board, to carry out some grand design. But if human beings have their own responses to government policies,...