In response to:

A Solid Romney Win Where It Matters

rchuang1654 Wrote: Oct 23, 2012 1:59 AM
That's a comment more appropriate for an all-ruling king, emperor or dictator. Didn't we have the American Revolution BECAUSE King George III thought he could dictate the political terms to the American colonies with impunity?

When analyzing who won a debate, you can look at a number of factors: Who achieved their overarchhing objective, who had the most memorable lines, who might have left behind ticking time bombs in terms of statements that will return to haunt them.  Looking at any of the three, Romney was the clear winner, and Obama the loser.

Obviously, Romney's overarching objective wasn't to score debate points on Benghazi or Syria.  It was to prove that he is competent, calm, knowledgeable and -- most emphatically -- not a warmonger.  It was to make sure he seemed presidential.  He achieved it.  By...