In response to:

Trial of Bin Laden’s Son-In-Law - House GOP Slams White House on Missed Intel Opportunity

rbombardier992 Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 5:07 PM
How ridiculous this appears. Doesn't anyone in this administration read Tom Clancy? Oh, of course not. That's more for Patriots. In Locked On there is a discussion on why this is not a good idea. Non-citizens have no right to be tried in American Courts. Yeah, give them and their lawyers a platform, why don't you. You know who will be on trial? The U.S. and Israel. This is treason, impeachable.
SugarLandSteve Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:15 PM
I wholeheartedly agree.

Will Boehner step up to the plate and do what his Oath of Office dictates?

I'm not holding my breath on that.
RVN70USMC Wrote: Mar 26, 2013 6:19 PM
Boehner will not. He is a sissy and a coward. He and the rest of the failed Republican/ Romney-loser leadership need to go. The party needs new, young blood.

A member of al Qaeda's senior command and son-in-law to Osama bin Laden, Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, pleaded not guilty on March 1 during a pre-trial in criminal court in New York on a charge of plotting to kill Americans.

The Obama administration’s rush to conduct trials of suspected terrorists on American soil is already extremely controversial. But now some law makers want to know if this case has obstructed efforts by U.S. intelligence agencies to gather vital information from the terror suspect and the chance to learn more about al-Qaida’s relationship with Iran, as well as its evolving strategy and capabilities.