Someone who's supporting Romney (a proven documented hypocrite and phony) wants to call someone who was honest rather then follow the parties hypocrisy a hypocrite? Irony

Im in total agreement our system is broken, corrupt. But how can you honestly compare the two?By this logic the lives of our soldiers put in harms way are great bargains? Shall we discuss the actual necessity of the said wars? Those who were killed in these wars are disposable $? Is this the latest neocon argument? Im very curious to hear what the actual dollar amount is per American soldier. Does this dollar amount include those who came back and offed themselves after being used as the empire's thugs? What does this author (and those who choose to use this argument) price the lives of innocent civilians at? If you can seriously argue this point then I think you should also factor in what a bargain you got for your soul.

Cheat and gloat, neoconservatives truly are scum. If you manage to rig the general election enjoy your Obama 2.0.

Nice to see something with a bit more substance then the standard rabid neocon article on townhall. The GOP establishment needs to start thinking about the image they are portraying when they repeatedly pull shady tactics during this primary. All to silence and minimize the only movement that can restore some honor to the republican party.

The rest just want power Im pretty sure we tried the "neocon" ticket with McCain Newt, Romney and Santorum are neocons. But might not matter kinda seems like the neocons are getting the diebold/ dead people vote this year so they might win anyway... Yay?

The rest just want power Im pretty sure we tried the "neocon" ticket with McCain Newt, Romney and Santorum are neocons. But might not matter kinda seems like the neocons are getting the diebold/ dead people vote this year so they might win anyway... Yay?

Whats Newt gonna do so different? Sell access from the oval office? pretty sure thats been done.

Missing the point. Newt IS "THE ESTABLISHMENT" just because Sean Hannity (also establishment) says he isn't does not make it true.

"the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time." No state action is envisaged in this lament; it denotes a spiritual wish, whereas the erroneous translation – "wipe Israel off the map" – suggests a military threat. There is a huge chasm between the correct and the incorrect translations. The notion that Iran can "wipe out" U.S.-backed, nuclear-armed Israel is ludicrous.

On October 26, 2005, IRIB News, an English-language subsidiary of the state-controlled Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), filed a story on Ahmadinejad's speech to the "World Without Zionism" conference in Asia, entitled: Ahmadinejad: Israel must be wiped off the map.[1] The story was picked up by Western news agencies and quickly made headlines around the world. On October 30, The New York Times published a full transcript of the speech in which Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying: