In response to:

Two Down, Two to Go: Scott Brown Outshines Elizabeth Warren in MA Senate Debate

RayTheAnarchoCapitalist Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 11:15 AM
I only saw the last half of the debate. Brown's answer to the Buffet Rule was great and he did a good job of showing that he'll cooperate with Democrats. He fumbled a little on the question of oil subsidies and his answer on leaving Afghanistan sucked. Warren had a good answer about Afghanistan but everything else was pathetic. Her demeanor was less than endearing. She clearly felt entitled to have to the first and last word on every issue. Given the opportunity to say something nice about Brown she responded with an oblique insult with which the crowd was obviously disgusted. Her whole campaign is apparently based on class envy, which isn't going to be a big seller in wealthy Massachusetts.
G-Pa Chaz Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 1:29 PM
But her whole campaign IS based on class envy; she envies anybody with class.
capitalust Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 8:39 PM

Tonight marked the second of four scheduled debates between incumbent Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) and his Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren. The topics of discussion ranged from the personal to the substantive -- allowing both candidates ample opportunity to make their pitch to voters. So let’s dive right in. The following is my gut reaction to how each candidate performed:

Scott Brown is a gifted debater. He was poised, prepared and aggressive all night -- always ready with a quick riposte to any misleading or factually inaccurate charge leveled against him. And he was relentless. When Elizabeth Warren asserted that...
Wednesday, June 19 | 09:32 PM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 09:32 PM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 09:32 PM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 09:32 PM ET