In response to:

When I Want a Progressive’s Opinion on What Guns I Should Have/Hunt with, I’ll Give it to Them

Raymond, (Ret) Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 8:33 AM
Two things to note about the Lefts mantra regarding guns. 1. The 2nd Amendment says our 'right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed'., so the Lefts argument that they are not talking about banning guns is specious as well as disingenuous. 2. The people who do not acknowledge that our right to keep and bear arms is so that we can protect ourselves from an oppressive government are the same people responsible for our government growing more and more powerful with more and more oppressive control over our lives.
Original Saepe_Expertus Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 8:49 AM is illuminating to note that the Second Amendment has nothing to say about whether or not one 'needs' a weapon.....
Raymond, (Ret) Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 9:15 AM
Actually, it does doesn't it? 'A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State...'
Dan107 Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 9:27 AM
That's right. The 2nd Amendment doesn't discuss why our right to bear arms shall not be infringed. If it did, the 2nd Amendment would come out to about 2700 pages, be drafted behind closed doors, and the Speaker of the House would tell us to vote on it so we can find out what's in it.
My buddy, Green Beret badass Bryan Sikes, shot a massive whitetail buck last week during our South Texas Purple Heart Adventure. He whacked said muy grande with a LaRue Tactical OBR chambered for the glorious .308 Win. round. Oh and BTW, Sikes used a high capacity magazine during this hunt.

For those of you who aren’t hip to the LaRue, it is a weapon that progressive darlings say we should not have because we don’t “need” such a weapon for hunting.

Hunting, according to these wizards of odd, is what they think our founding fathers had in mind when...

Related Tags: Guns Hunting Hunting Rights