In response to:

Notorious Anti-Islam YouTube Video Not Mentioned in Clinton Testimony

Raymond, (Ret) Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 9:46 AM
The Republicans were worse. They made speeches and crowded so many implied or stated questions into them that it was duck soup, giving Hillary such a wide range of subject matter that it was duck soup for her to ramble on, taking up time, without ever even responding to any of those questions much less providing any answers. Even John McCain’s rant that is being replayed so often to support the notion that Hillary was on the hot seat was absolutely useless. Nobody cares, within the forum of this hearing, what Senator McCain thinks. We wanted to know what Hillary knew, when did she know it, how she came to know it and who told her.
americathebeautiful Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 9:59 AM
And Raymond, hillary LIED through her demonic teeth when she flatly denied having watched that heinous attack in real time. SHE WATCHED IT ALONG WITH OBAMA and THEY DECIDED TO TAKE NO ACTION TO SAVE THOSE AMERICANS! PERIOD!~
LearningCommunity Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 9:53 AM
Excellent.

I of the things clinton said was the state department get over a 1M emails a day. Most addressed to her.

So the question is how does the community filter the information on its way to the decision makers.
Raymond, (Ret) Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 9:48 AM
d. How far up the State Department organization did this information go?
e. What documents are available for that?

Get the idea now boneheads?
Raymond, (Ret) Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 9:48 AM
14. Did you request credible evidence?
15. Wouldn’t you agree that relying on someone else’s unsupported speculation is itself engaging in unsupported speculation?
16. How many times do you now know Ambassador Stephens reported that there was trouble brewing and ask for assistance?
17. For each one:
a. How did he communicate this information?
b. What documents are available for that?
c. To whom did he communicate?
Raymond, (Ret) Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 9:47 AM
Here is my idea of how the questioning should have gone:
1. Secretary Clinton when did you first become informed that there was a situation at the embassy in Benghazi?
2. Where were you at that time?
3. What were you told?
4. Who told you
5. By what means was this information conveyed?
6. What documentation is available regarding that?
7. When did you first encounter the idea that it was an unorganized mob responding to that video?
8. Where were you at that time?
9. What were you told?
10. Who told you?
11. By what means was this information conveyed?
12. What documentation is available regarding that?
13. You have stated that you did not want to engage in unsupported speculation. What credible evidence did they provide to support that idea

UPDATE: During Clinton's testimony in front of the House Armed Services Committee Wednesday afternoon, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher, Matt Salmon and Mo Brooks mentioned the anti-Islam film originally blamed for the attack. Clinton danced around the subject by saying the investigation into what happened in Benghazi is ongoing. The best exchange was between Clinton and Brooks:

 

U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens sent multiple requests for more security to the State Department throughout 2012 and cited al Qaeda threats as a reason why it was needed. The extra security was never...