Dr. Sowell doesn't point out that the administration and faculty of colleges today are the students who protested in the 1960's. To work contrary to that now would destroy all of the self-righteous esteem in which they hold themselves.

Yep, and don't forget the hypocrisy of these MLK exploiters saying that 'character doesn't matter'.

I know this would make Bob Beckel roll his eyes in disdain but once again imagine what would be said if this had happened while Bush was President.

They should do do as a purely pragmatic concession to reality. The Republicans will be accused of politicizing whether they do it or not

They never got tired of making excuses for Bill Clinton. No matter how much they lower the bar these snakes will find a way to slither underneath it.

But Obama's rabid supporters will continue to believe him over their lying eyes and reading comprehension.

Nobody is saying there is proof. They are saying that there is enough evidence to warrant investigation. Any continued stalling, and stonewalling by the WH is further evidence.

I do not believe she did not inform president Obama of what she knew but he cannot continue to claim otherwise without firing her immediately. Even then, the buck does not stop. He hired her, she works for him and responsibility for how she performs her duties is his. Somewhere along the line this administration must be stopped from successfully surviving by pleading incompetence to deny culpability.

Yes, I heard him say that the released e-mails 'backed up' the WH's contention that the CIA said it was the video right from the start. Then I read an AP column in my paper that reported the same thing. Even if those who are inclined to believe this administration ever expose themselves to contrary reporting, they will simply dismiss it as politically motivated lies.; the 'bad guys' word against the 'good guys'. As in the case of Benghazi, they will claim there is no evidence by virtue of having dismissed it all. When they say 'there is no evidence' they mean 'there is no indisputable proof'. But proof rarely comes from any single piece of evidence and some evidence is what warrants investigation for more that may lead to proof.

I agree with Bloomberg except to the usual typical liberal hubris of basing it on intelligence. Anyone who has observed the ways in which the old time tradesmen have overcome problems with their minds rather than their technology knows that ia trade and intelligence are far from mutually exclusive.

Or you could get a Liberal Arts degree and then still not be any more qualified for any job than you were before other than the artificial qualification of having a college degree.