In response to:

Gun Violence -- Let's Shift the Odds in Favor of the Good Guys!

Raymond121 Wrote: Dec 20, 2012 11:51 AM
Every business that advertuses itself as a "gun free zone" but does NOT actively protect its patrons with security measures should be liable to suit for deception leading peopke to dusarm themselvrs. State legislatures sgoyld make it law that anyone wanting to make their store a "gun free zone" has to actialky do it through guards, metal detectors and x-ray screening like any cpurthouse or airpirt. The school boards who failed to protect students shoykd be hekd responsible forwrongful death for children they wete protect.

The unimaginable horror of Sandy Hook jumpstarts another "national conversation" about firearm violence. President Barack Obama, promising "meaningful action," said: "We will have to change. ... We can't tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end."

Let's examine four of the "commonsense" measures frequently proposed by "gun control advocates":

One, closing the "gun show loophole." What gun show loophole? Restricted from selling at guns shows prior to 1986, a licensed dealer today requires a background check whether he sells guns at a store, a gun show or the back of his SUV.

Two, banning "high-capacity" magazines. One of...