1 - 10 Next
"What it must mean, to the extent Obama hasn't destroyed it himself, is the utter neutralization of the Obama administration." Clinton (or the Clinton's) was supposed to be finished off by impeachment. Recall all the Democrats insisting he was a criminal and they would be leading the charge to have him locked up, if only he were allowed to "finish his term". Now Clinton has been rehabilitated from criminal to elder statesman. This time, ALL the criminal wrongdoing of this administration (and there is plenty) must be publically aired and the few remaining Democrats in office shamed into condemning these actions. Obama needs to be thoroughly discredited and "Nixoned". Otherwise he will become far more dangerous as the leader of the new Civil Rights wars that will be inflicted upon this nation for the next 30 year. (It's what community organizers do) Republicans must learn the reality there is no playing nice or remaining civil with liberals. They play for keeps and must be destroyed when you have the chance.
Like how Obama has done such a good job of abiding by the constitution? How about the IRS or the DOJ? Apparently you didn't hear about the FEDS raiding the gun shop where Nancy Lanza's Bushmaster was supposedly sold and appropriating all records there. You missed the siege at Cliven Bundy's ranch, Gibson Guitars, Randy Weavers home and Waco? The gun store records of you purchasing ONE gun are all they need to go in and "make sure" you are still in possession of it and have not disposed of it "illegally". Universal Background Checks is all the FEDS need to justify anything they want to do. That includes using ANY discrepancy (like a partial middle name on a form) to determine your gun is now ILLEGAL.
So these "Mom's" are concerned about saving lives? They can start with outlawing ABORTION which terminates ONE MILLION lives every year.
The big goal all along for the anti-gun crowd has always been what they call the "gunshow loophole" . That is their code word for de-facto gun registration. Gun dealers are required to keep paperwork on all transactions and ATF (illegally) helps themselves to those records any time they want. They did it at the gun store where Nancy Lanza supposedly bought her Bushmaster. The "gunshow loophole" would require all private transactions to go through a licensed ffl dealer with the same availability of records to the FEDS. Once the "universal background check" is established, cops will be able to go door to door and search for any "uncleared" weapons. If you can't produce the receipt for every gun you own proving YOU are the owner, you will be in possession of an "illegal" weapon. (hint: your receipt has your middle initial but not your full middle name? You are not the legal owner. Your address is different from what it was when you legally purchased your gun? You are not the legal owner. Bought that gun before you were married and used your maiden name? You are no longer the legal owner) Of course, as soon as they discover ONE "illegal" gun in your household (say your great-grandfathers shotgun) you instantly become a felon and ALL your weapons will be confiscated.
"(In one case, in Beaver County, it) cost the county about $13,000 in revenue," she said, because an employee was discounting permit costs for friends," McMullen, along with two other auditors, filed a lawsuit against Sheriff Nace This lawsuit has already cost the tax payers a lot more than 13 grand. The auditors will decide whether to file an appeal in the coming days. And run up the tab even MORE on the taxpayers dime. (and how many "friends" does this one employee have that he could accumulate $13,000. in discounts on permits?)
And this comes 2 month BEFORE the mid-term election. Imagine what the numbers will be after Harry Reid is no longer in a position to run interference for Obama.
This migration is reflected in firearms manufacturers who leave liberal gun control states for second amendment friendly states. It is just another example of the Balkanization of America. We are becoming, more and more two separate nations and the final result will be some sort of two state solution.
The proposal would "blend legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty with new voluntary pledges. Isn't this the same Obama Administration that took a House passed farm bill, gutted the wording and inserted The Affordable Care Act to claim the House had "passed" Obamacare? Sounds like the same old ploy all over again.
" an unpopular president and his more-unpopular partisan adversaries" Interesting that the NYT points out republicans in congress are MORE unpopular than Obama................as those "more-unpopular" Republicans are about to deliver another stinging electoral defeat to this less-unpopular president.
" an unpopular president and his more-unpopular partisan adversaries" Interesting that the NYT points out republicans in congress are MORE unpopular than Obama................as those "more-unpopular" Republicans are about to deliver another stinging electoral defeat to this less-unpopular president.
1 - 10 Next