In response to:

Rubio's Strong, Accessible Rebuttal

rauljg69 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 11:41 AM
You argument is falling on deaf ears. I assume you are trying to make a point that since we disagree with a hispanic we must be racist? Well you see the difference is when we disagree we dont pepper in the terms wet back, swimmer, spic, and go back illegal alien. We can disagree on policy and ideas. Conservatives on the other hand seem to have to do both. I know I get it directly all the time first hand on this site. And you regulars have witnessed it and know it to be true.
gatorbait Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 11:56 AM
HEY RAUL,,
If Reps disagree with Obama we get the same treatment

EVERYONE MUST BE RACIST, THATS ALL WE GET FROM YOU TURDS WHEN WE DISAGREE WITH OBAMA AND EVERYONE ON HERE KNOWS THAT ALSO

IM NOT RACIST I HATE EVERYONE EQUALLY....
rauljg69 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 11:55 AM
Did you explain to your friends below that you were talking about Paul Ryan? They seemed really lost.
rauljg69 Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 11:54 AM
I attacked when attacked by a ss holes like you. Should I just sit there and take it? Don't think so.
The Sloandog Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 11:46 AM
You aren't Hispanic, all trolls lie
DSMike Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 11:45 AM
I posted many policy differences below...no comments by the intellectual Illuminati of the left....hmmmm

Responding to a presidential State of the Union speech is often a thankless task. Following the president's act, which oozes prestige and historic significance, almost always makes the next guy seem small and trivial by comparison. As it goes, the designated member of the opposition party is typically holed up in a room somewhere with little more than a camera, some lights and a teleprompter.  The rejoinder he or she offers is almost always instantly forgotten; when it's not, it's usually for the wrong reasons.  Sen. Marco Rubio broke the mold last night.  He delivered a substantive, relatable and...