In response to:

No Gun Licenses for Marathon Bombers

rauljg69 Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 11:48 AM
I enjoy the banter. I have to see for myself that there are really right wing fringe ideas out there. Just dont take the liberal websites or medias word for it. I ask the same of you with just how far off base you are with your conservative ideology. I see the fervor on the far left wing very similar to most of you just opposite end of political spectrum. And I disagree with your last statement. You think that there there is this magical conservative ayn rand utopia that would have no crime and everyone would be happy and prosperous and all the ills of the world is because of liberals. Naive. And finally why not have a differing opinion on the site? I would be arguing with the far left boards as well they are just as rigid.
BabyChe'sCrushedSkull Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 12:27 PM
If I went there to debate, that would certainly be true. If I went ther to be a dooshbag, like you and 99.999999999999% of the other trolls do, I would have it coming. Like you.
scrow Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 12:11 PM
"I have to see for myself that there are really right wing fringe ideas out there. "

Assuming it's true, okay, you've seen it. What's the point of coming back to see the same thing, that you know is already there?
scrow Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 12:10 PM
Unless you're playing devil's advocate, you come across as just as rigid for the most part as anyone I've read on both types of sites.

And if all you can do is play devil's advocate, you're not really contributing...
rauljg69 Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 12:03 PM
Disrespectful to debate current political topics? If you go on there and they curse at you and disparage you its not disrespectful to defend yourself.
Buck O Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 11:53 AM
Yes, we're rigid. Truth, facts, and logic tend to be that way.
BabyChe'sCrushedSkull Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 11:51 AM
But you don't. (Neither do I. Me trolling a left-wing site would be just as disrespectful.)

The AP reports that the men who detonated explosives to kill innocents at the Boston Marathons and later engaged in a shoot-out with police (after shooting an MIT security guard execution-style) didn't have gun permits, according to Massachusetts state police. 

But wait a minute.  I thought a rigorous system for regulating gun permits was supposed to prevent gun violence (that's what Massachusetts state officials insisted upon passing the nation's toughest gun laws back in 1998).  

It's almost as if the Tsarnaev brothers -- terrorists, murderers, carjackers -- had no respect for the (gun) laws . . .