In response to:

The Polluted Documentary Oscar Pool

ranma2 Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 1:41 AM
It is so bad that It is the 4-th most successful documentary of all time, huh? I guess, your useless opinion has just been trumped by the millions of people who went and pay for the movie tickets. It goes to show just how much worth your opinion holds in the real world, Sweinstein.
upwithRomney Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 9:54 PM
I am a conservative and I went to see it and it is bad. I am afraid that millions of republicans went to se it just because it attacked Obama. It is one badly made movie. . . .especially the last 40 minutes.
FletchforFreedom Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 7:44 PM
You might be describing any film by Michael Moore except that calling them "garbage" is to give them too much credit.
Colonialgirl Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 6:45 PM
Warning nothing but a brain dead liberal BS spewing troll.

You are nothing but a sewer dwelling troll spewing a load from the materials in the sewer that's located between your ears. Now, GO do your usual nut bagging.
Carl469 Wrote: Dec 07, 2012 5:20 PM
It was popular and it was garbage -- both.
The cabal that chooses the 15 nominees for the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature has issued its 2013 selections. Why was the top-grossing documentary of 2012 -- and the fourth most-successful documentary of all time - not on that expansive list?

Because it was "2016," the film in which conservative author Dinesh D'Souza warns of a dark future for America if Barack Obama is re-elected. The film's producer, Gerald Molen, who already won an Oscar for "Schindler's List," was scandalized. "The action confirms my opinion that the bias against anything from a conservative point of view is dead...