In response to:

GOP Solution: Stick to Values, Pick Better Candidates

ranma2 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 2:38 AM
DISAGREE!!! Majority of USA is pro-abortion? Where did you get this idea? If you want a candidate who knows the difference between right or wrong, then you want a candidate who is against abortion.
lkartchner Wrote: Nov 14, 2012 12:56 PM
"Right to Chose" is a code term for Pro-Abortion. No other choice is intimated or intended. It's a Litmus test for "Progressive" "Liberal" candidates.

Of course Progressive means pushing progress towards total government control and a socialist economy, and Liberal means allowing unlimited bureaucracy. But, hey, they change the words. It's like Gay used to mean (Prior to 1975) light hearted and happy. Now, it just means perverted sexually.

These are days of hindsight and second-guessing for Republicans, which is human nature after a trauma like this election loss.

There are million “why” theories out there, from the Hurricane Sandy effect to pernicious media bias. Wringing our hands over those factors gets us nowhere.

We can’t stop hurricanes, and media bias is always there. Reagan and Bush 43 won twice against waves of poisonous bias, so that is not an insurmountable obstacle.

What Republicans need is a slate of candidates that can energize the base while expanding the appeal of a conservative message.


Related Tags: Mitt Romney