In response to:

New Data on Border Crossings Could Change Immigration Debate

randygaiser Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 9:19 AM
First of all, I think we can all agree that Janet Napolitano is an IDIOT, that was placed in a position that she could not handle. Second, this administration has been acting AGAINST everything we were ever taught about this country and the AMERICAN way of life and values. A great number of people in positions of authority have said that it would be impossible to round up all 12, 15, or 20 million people that have entered this country illegally and deport them. This may be true, however, for every one that we do deport, will be one less ILLEGAL to rob this country of our resources that WE the taxpayer have paid for. I say we need to place the Military on the borders with orders to shoot to kill anyone that fails to turn around and return.
GodSaveUSA Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 9:46 AM
They SHOULD NOT GIVE them one THIN DIME!! Further more, they need to "contact" Mr. Webster......"ILLEGAL" has a NEW DEFINITION!!

There's a confrontation coming between the Obama administration and Republicans in Congress over the most basic question of immigration reform: How secure is the U.S. border with Mexico?

Not only does the administration not know -- and perhaps doesn't want to know -- but there are signs the border is less secure than some of the most skeptical Republicans thought.

Last year the Border Patrol began experimenting with a new drone-based surveillance system that had been developed for finding Taliban fighters in Afghanistan. Starting in the fall, officials used the radar-based system over a fairly small portion of the Arizona border....