Dan Pfeiffer huffed, "The assertions from Republicans that the president didn't take action is offensive." Yes Dan you are right, it is very, very offensive, so why didn't Obama take action, instead of going to bed early. in preperation for his fund-raisng trip to Las Vegas the next day. It seems Obama stayed up and watched the live feed of Seal Team 6 killing Bin Laden, but couldn't stay up and watch the live feed of Americans under a terrorist attack in Benghazi, and allowed someone in the DOD to order a Special Forces Team, trained for these type of situations, to stand-down and not take a C130 to Benghazi, with Libyan Government permission, to help save those Americans who were eventually killed, and if not for 2 CIA agents, that were former Navy Seals, disobeying stand-down orders 3 times, more Americans at the Consulate would have been killed. I agree with you Dan, this is very, very offensive, that the Commander-in-Chief goes to sleep while 30 plus Americans are being attacked by terrorists, resulting in 4 of them being killed, and Obama did nothing, didn't even make an attempt, to help or save them, but went to bed instead.

After reading this article, one would question, "Who's running the assylum", but knowing Obama's faults, this is very plausible. Obama can read from a teleprompter very well, far better than most, but when it comes to leadership skills he is an embarrassment as our President. The position he holds ingratiates himself with celebrities, making him think he is one also, and acts as such, incompetent as he may be, which this article implies and proves. As President, he takes great vacations, very expensive and many of them, but when problems arise, he has always been known to lead from behind, which really is the definition of a follower and the rumors of his subordinates making his decisions for him were proven true when Vallery Jarret was said to have denied allowing the attack on Bin Laden's Pakistan compound five times, but the fifth time Leon Panetta and Hillary Clinton convinced him to allow it by imparting how bad the 'Press' would be if anyone found out he wouldn't let are military go after Bin Laden once his location was known to have been found. Another trait of Obama's of always blaming others and never accepting responsibility for mistakes or failures, is another attribute of one who has no leadership skills, which Obama has been doing since day one of his Presidency. All of this is old news, yet Obama is going to be President for another four years, so apparently it doesn't matter to the people of the USA, who through all these scandals, are getting what they voted for and deserve.

What a bunch of BS! We spend 15 times the amount today then we did when Reagan's amnesty was passed, but the interdiction is false, because we don't deport the hugh majority of those we do catch, even when they commit crimes after they've come here. The reason for the record number of deportations during Obama's first term is because of Obama's lack of enforcement in stopping the border crossings in the first place, resulting in a record and tremendously high number of illegal immigrants coming here, and that 1.5 million deportation number is less in percentage than was being deported before Obama and the Democrats took control of our government, and stopped enforcing our laws, because they figure they could gain an advantage in our elections for doing so. At least 9 out of 10 illegal immigrants vote Democratic, and they do vote, because Obama's appointee to head the Department of Justice, Attorney General Eric Holder, under Obama's orders, fights in federal courts to stop states from enacting voter reform through citizenship pictured ID requirements, that would stop these illegal immigrants from voting in our elections, as they now do according to the level of audacity that Obama can instill in them, which has been much since they now march openly as illegal immigrants in protest against deportation, and their denial of achieving an amnesty and citizenship. 3.5 million gained citizenship through Reagans amnesty, at least 20 million will gain citizenship if this amnesty goes through, and in the next 20 years another 60 million will do the same with the example of what we've let occur in the first two amnesties, turning the USA into another Mexico, because the Latino population will then control our political processes.

"Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible." This was only when politicians, including Democrats, deemed it necessary to balance our yearly budgets and pay down our national debt. Since the Democrats discovered they could get even more fraudulent votes by allowing these dependent people into the country, they have fought not to deport any possible future Democratic voter, fraudulent or not, they all count when Democrats control the ballot box. The nation is being destroyed, but Democrats will be in control when it is.

Ahh, anyone who disagrees with your ideas, principles, or philosophies you label as a 'BULLY'. Understandable, since you are ignorant to the fact that labeling people derogatorily is 'BULLYING'. Then again, only ignorant and unintelligent people are ever 'BULLIES', it seems to be in their genes, as is the lack of intelligence, which breeds their ignorance. Watch out for what you say, it sometimes labels you as a 'BULLY'.

Strange how it is always only tyrants that want to ban guns from their people, at least history shows us that after their ban is successful. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, and Mao, just to name a few. I wonder if Obama is successful with his attempt to ban guns from American citizens, if his name will eventually be added to that list? Only time will tell, but what an awful risk we as Americans would be taking if we allow Obama to be successful with his gun ban. One should ask if that risk is worth the outcome, for they have the same bans in Chicago and Washington DC, now the two most dangerous cities in the USA with the highest murder rates in our country, and they were not that way before the weapons ban.

King George III put the same type of weapons ban on the American Colonists that dumb or dumber, which ever Jim Carrey was or is, advocates as Obama and Biden does. I wonder how history would have been changed had his Redcoat Army been successful in carrying out that ban. Strange that Jim Carrey has no worries or reservations on how Janet Napolitano is arming the DHS and it's several different departments and agencies, with the same weapons he, Obama, and Biden want banned for American law abiding citizens, which since all these that Janet Napolitano is arming are strictly for the use on our streets and only against the American people. But I guess that's why Jim Carrey got the role of dumb or dumber, which ever, it's in his character.

“As with any academic lesson, the exercise was meant to encourage students to view issues from many perspectives, in direct relation with the course objectives,” said Noemi Marin, the university’s director of the school of communication and multimedia studies.“While at times the topics discussed may be sensitive, a university environment is a venue for such dialogue and debate,” Marin added. There's a big difference between discussing a topic that pertains to one's religion, and taking actions to desecrate that religion, as stomping on the name of Jesus would be for any true Christian. I wonder why the instructor Deandre Poole didn't request Muhammad's name be used to be stomped on? Is Deandre Poole or the author of the lesson a Muslim?

This will result in 54 million, instead of the original 50 million, without healthcare but paying the government a tax penalty, and 100 million dropped from the employers healthcare, saving employers money by paying the tax penalty instead of the total cost of healthcare for those 100 million, which 4 million will have to buy their own healthcare with no assistance from their employer or the government, and 36 million will go without any healthcare but pay the government a tax penalty, and 60 million will have to settle for a lesser healthcare provided by the government, with 2 million previous without healthcare being forced to buy it, and 18 million previous without healthcare, having to pay the government the tax penalty.

will be forced to buy it or pay the tax penalty, the remaining 60 million the government will provide it for them because the government will claim they are indigent and cannot afford to buy it. The original 20 million and the 40 million dropped by their employers who could no longer afford to pay for it, 90% of those won't be able to fit the cost into their budgets and will opt to go without and pay the tax penalty instead, which comes to 54 million that will go without and pay the tax penalty, and employers paying the tax penalty for the 100 million employees they opted to drop, making 154 million paying for 90 million the government will provide it for. Those are the ones who deserve healthcare, according to the our government.