In response to:

"Peaceful" Occupiers Attempt to Blow Up a Bridge

Randall133 Wrote: May 02, 2012 1:44 AM
When they were arrested for impeding traffic... they called it a violation of free speech. When they were arrested for destroying private and public property...they called it a violation of free speech. When they were arrested for violence and assault... they called it a violation of free speech. When they were arrested for laying siege by barricading ports, businesses and cities... they called it a violation of free speech. So... Is Terrorism now covered in our free speech protections as well?
Happy Jake Wrote: May 02, 2012 5:54 AM
If the terrorism is conducted by Leftists, it's just another form of expression, like going to church or burning a flag or broadcasting porn. It's all the same.
Happy Jake Wrote: May 02, 2012 5:59 AM
And just wait until the Republicans get back in the White House. The OWS brats will be shouting "oppression" any time anyone looks at them sideways.

Yesterday I warned readers May Day would be violent and well, here we are. Five anarchist occupiers were arrested yesterday for attempting to blow up a bridge in Ohio.

According to an affidavit unsealed on Tuesday, five Cleveland men—at least three whom are self-described anarchists—were recently arrested for plotting to blow up a bridge as part of the May Day protests, according to the Daily Mail. A member of Occupy Cleveland revealed that some of the men had ties to the group as well, but their media coordinator denied any knowledge of the planned attacks.
...