tell the families of the bodies that the stoners' suppliers are piling up in Mexico & (to a lesser extent) in the US that they are causing no harm. And has Obama tried to find the survivors of his suppliers' victims? Just wondering

# 4- I don't know about executing drug dealers, but there is no reason for it to be illegal to sell poison to anyone if the buyer understands it to be from a list of controlled substances. Cocaine, heroine etc. No reason that the drivers behind the entire industry - the USERS should be immune to the dangers that they cause the rest of society.

Raul Uhm It's not like the GOP asked for the recall. Yes. it will be good if the unprincipled party is defeated, so that is why all decent people hope the recall fails.And BTW the Dems will crow about it if they win this farce.

Raul This column and other places show examples of the unrelenting Liberal bias of the MSN. Please provide examples of Fox bias.

see ScrapIron's 6:39 reply, above

The problem is that the elite Democrats/progs/libs are so much smarter than the ignert Bible-clinging rednecks that supply the money. It is hard for them to explain to us of lesser abilities the necessity of spending $X billion without any usable results. This is not even addressing the fact that no mortal can know what is in the research bill unless it gets passed.

Same reason I do Shubi. Because the voters of Mass are going to elect her. And she can then read the DNC acceptance speech: "I am humbled to ..."

Actually, it was the Chicago Tribune. The headline was written based on best available data nationwide & the Trib disliked Truman. If the NYT had believed that Dewey was winning, the headline would have been "St Harry Loses after Massive Voter Fraud"

Let's not forget that the major newspapers had to pay linotype setters (or whatever they're called) LONG after they were replaced by more efficient machinery, to do work that was no longer needed or even used. Union rules forbade firing of drones. Strangely, the NYT was not on the union's side in this particular conflict and eventually found some way of firing these unfortunate workers. I've never really read any explanation of their anti-union action, other than than "it saved us money." I always thought the NYT mgt would collectively kill themselves or at least work for free, and their stockholders would opt for bankruptcy rather than adopt a conservative stance.

Robt I haven't looked it up, but I believe Teddy did not graduate from Harvard. I do know he was expelled for paying smarter (ie average) people to take tests for him