In response to:

Report: Obama Was Briefed on Benghazi Terrorism Connection Days Before Susan Rice's Public Denials

Radley2 Wrote: Nov 19, 2012 11:21 AM
While this is bad... lying and covering up what happened. The real issues that he and many of his minions should fry for are: 1) denying requests for additional security for weeks before the attack... and in fact taking the secuity team out of the area. This almost makes it seem as if they knew it was coming and didn't want a fight to take place. 2) Not sending any help to the location, despite requests for it and it being less than an hour flight away. two F16's would have done it... a C-130 gun ship (less than 2 hours flight)... specail forces (less than 2 hours away)... OR an armed drone. They got one with a camera there... Again, this makes it seem as if they didn't want a fight. 3) Did the president lie again about telling the
Radley2 Wrote: Nov 19, 2012 11:22 AM
military to do anything it could to help our guys... or did the generals just ignore him. Either way it is not a good thing.
4) A trained SEAL does not paint a target unless there are assets in the area that can take it out. Why did he think there were?

Just last week, the president adamantly defended his Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, who is widely rumored to be a leading contender to replace Hillary Clinton at State.  Rice appeared on all five Sunday morning shows on September 16, five days after the deadly 9/11 attacks.  She advanced three core assertions for public consumption:
 

(1) The the violence had spilled over from "spontaneous" protests over an internet video.  (There were no protests outside of the Benghazi consulate leading up to the...