1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Megyn Kelly Destroys Bill Ayers, Again

Radley2 Wrote: 23 hours ago (9:59 AM)
It exposes Bill for who he really is... And if you bought a ticket to watch, then you are a sucker.
In response to:

Megyn Kelly Destroys Bill Ayers, Again

Radley2 Wrote: 23 hours ago (9:54 AM)
Megan's eyes are a way that Bill can change the subject from the fact that she completely took him apart with here interview... and exposed him as the fraud and anti-American that he is. She should be applauded for bringing him on and taking him on one on one and exposing him... after all, there is the first amendment and he is entitled to say what he thinks. The problem he and his like have are that when they are given this kind of exposure with someone as tough as Megan is, they come off looking like the people they really are... especially compared to someone who is as consistent and honest as Megan is. As for her eyes, she is like anyone who is tough and has a soul... she can be warm when she is in a friendly situation, but can be as cold and tough as needed when confronted with someone who lies and rationalizes to stay relevant. As an Air Force veteran, I can say that I know that most in our military have that same trait. They are warm when helping anyone out, but will bull their neck, stiffen their spine and steel their eyes and stand in harms way to protect us when confronted with evil. There need to be far more like Megan in he Media... if there was, the posers who want to do us harm under the guise of helping us would be exposed and we would all be better off.
It is preferable to any American who holds the constitution to be the law of the land to have Holder and his crew to just follow the law and enforce them as written... and to stop all the political agenda positioning that he is constantly involved in. Or leave...
So why is Obama still there?
Does Bart Stupak know this? Guess that "Executive Order" really didn't hold much weight did it... wonder if he feels played? Or just stupid!
Maybe we should send Kerry into the Islamic State to have direct talks with them... It makes as much sense as NOT putting any American boots on the ground. But Kerry, who served in Vietnam, may just bore them to death. Attack... don't talk. It has been 5 days since the big speech. We have not done anything new, but we've been told by the administration that we've done what we need to to deal with ISIS. What are these guys smoking? Attack.... and wipe them out... with overwhelming air power right now, while we put a couple hundred thousand US troops on the ground and then wipe them out in a week! Overwhelming force is the ONLY way... and it works.
In response to:

O Audit, Where Art Thou?

Radley2 Wrote: Sep 13, 2014 6:41 AM
It is only a "mistake" because someone found out about it... but not to worry, the same people who made those mistakes are doing an audit on themselves. I wonder where they will be getting the money to do that... and what time clock they will be on when doing this work? Oh, the ways of government officials... with that endless revenue stream from our paychecks!
In response to:

The 'No Strategy' Strategy

Radley2 Wrote: Sep 12, 2014 9:20 AM
I wonder if those undeclared chemical weapons now being used in Syria have Iraqi labels on them? Maybe that is why he didn't declare them, as they didn't belong to him, they belonged to Saddam Hussein. hmmm....
I have a question about Obama's constant claim that we won't have any "combat troops" in the fray... As an Air Force veteran, I wonder what he thinks the pilots, who are flying the planes providing the air cover for someone's ground forces, are? They are American troops and they are in a combat area firing live munitions. That sounds like they are there? But then, I'm just a "normal" citizen... so maybe I just don't understand because it is so complicated. But then again... maybe Obama is just playing word games and lying to us about this too.
He told us that he has the authority to bomb in Iraq and by extension Syria, and doesn't have to go to congress to get approval... because? the original approval is still in place? didn't he end that when he took out all the troops and told us the war was over? By that reasoning, we could bomb just about anywhere in Europe or Asia if we wanted to because we once fought WWII there. That is madness. What did he actually teach in those "Constitutional Law" courses he claims to have taught?
1 - 10 Next