In response to:

Rand Paul: Why I Did What I Did

radical notion Wrote: Mar 09, 2013 2:57 PM
he's just another medical school brat-prima dona. What he doesn't know about the Constitution, government and history could fill even his vacant head.
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Mar 10, 2013 12:24 AM
REally? Sez who? You the bought and paid for troll?
Corbett_ Wrote: Mar 09, 2013 3:38 PM
Radical:

What part of "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, ... nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;" can't you understand?
Ryan_M Wrote: Mar 09, 2013 3:46 PM
Corbett,

The same part that UberDave fails to understand.
Ryan_M Wrote: Mar 09, 2013 3:03 PM
You're undoubtedly right, as your highly erudite post shows us exactly why this is the case.

Too many pundits in the national news media glibly stated over and over again that Kentucky Senator Rand Paul stood on the floor of the United States Senate -- for nearly thirteen straight hours last Wednesday -- to “filibuster” President Obama’s nominee for CIA Director. And sure, while this is technically true, in my view this sort of political analysis completely misses the mark. Writing in the Washington Times on Friday, the senator explained in his own words why he rose to speak that day -- namely, to defend the principles enshrined in the United States Constitution:

On Wednesday,...