In response to:

Obama's Land of the LOST

R. Thomas2 Wrote: May 25, 2012 8:37 AM
This treaty also includes the provision (read 'demands') that US companies transfer, give away, their patented mining and drilling technology destroying any competitive advantage US companies have in the world. And, once that technology is stolen from US companies, they have no recourse in US law. This is no different than the UN making laws that require you to give away your children if a UN committee decides that your kids are required by another nation.
Jay Wye Wrote: May 25, 2012 9:30 AM
this is nothing more than a protection racket.
We pay the UN and other nations to leave us alone while we develop resources and wealth they would and could never touch without us.
rickmcq Wrote: May 25, 2012 8:39 AM
Gee, I wonder if ModMark has any quotes of Navy brass supporting that part...
shubi_ Wrote: May 25, 2012 8:52 AM
That was not the only reason Reagan would never sign the UN treaty. Reagan hated the UN and so do all patriots.
Georgetwin now residing in PA Wrote: May 25, 2012 8:53 AM
"Goggle is your friend"

AA should be your friend.
rickmcq Wrote: May 25, 2012 9:02 AM
"those provision were modifies to satisfy US concerns."

Apparently not modified sufficiently to get Congress to support it, Mark.

What's green and blue and grabby all over? President Obama's new pressure campaign for Congress to ratify the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST).

The fight over LOST goes back three decades, when it was first rejected by President Ronald Reagan. He warned that "no national interest of the United States could justify handing sovereign control of two-thirds of the Earth's surface over to the Third World." According to top Reagan officials William Clark and Ed Meese, their boss believed the "central, and abiding, defect" was "its effort to promote global government at the expense of sovereign nation states...

Saturday, May 25 | 08:26 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 08:26 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 08:26 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 08:26 AM ET