This from the NEA: "Recommended Reading: Saul Alinsky, The American Organizer A Resource for Every Organizer & Anyone Contemplating Action in Their Community NEA recommends the following Saul Alinsky books to those members of our Association who are involved in grassroots organizing, especially Association Representatives (ARs) — also known as building reps or shop stewards — and leaders at local affiliates. Saul Alinsky is widely recognized as the father of, and pre-imminent expert in, grassroots organizing, which is why we recommend that ARs and local leaders become familiar with his theories & materials..............................................." http://www.nea.org/tools/17231.htm

This from the NEA: "Recommended Reading: Saul Alinsky, The American Organizer A Resource for Every Organizer & Anyone Contemplating Action in Their Community NEA recommends the following Saul Alinsky books to those members of our Association who are involved in grassroots organizing, especially Association Representatives (ARs) — also known as building reps or shop stewards — and leaders at local affiliates......................................." http://www.nea.org/tools/17231.htm

So everyone has a reference as to why the current crop of teachers and thus students adores this president (not capitalized intentionally) to the degree we all see. Here's s link to National Education Association's suggested reading page on their website. http://www.nea.org/tools/17231.htm "Recommended Reading: Saul Alinsky, The American Organizer A Resource for Every Organizer & Anyone Contemplating Action in Their Community NEA recommends the following Saul Alinsky books to those members of our Association who are involved in grassroots organizing, especially Association Representatives (ARs) — also known as building reps or shop stewards — and leaders at local affiliates. Saul Alinsky is widely recognized as the father of,...

Just another method with she can bust your cojones. We`ve all not grown up the same, but with very similar morals and values. You know how it is. You know not to talk about anyone`s mother and sister in mixed company or otherwise.

Folks, while casting aspersions is all part of the sport of political debate, poor dear Allison, of whom we know not a thing (other than her whacky rants), really shouldn't called a wh0re (unless of course, she's admitted to the trade). Whether or not Allie's got round heels or not shouldn't be our concern. Let the context of her vociferations provide us with our ordnance. I know it's the same old cr@p but, y'all know what I mean.

The other day I commented on this subject (another article). The the main point was: the Obama administration (and his complicit toadies) have been applying the Heckler's Veto to every hot button THEY bring up. Again: A Heckler's Veto occurs when an acting party's right to freedom of speech is curtailed or restricted in order to prevent a reacting party's behavior. The common example is that of demonstrators (the administration) causing a speech (Rev. Jones) to be terminated in order to preserve the peace. Seems very Alinsky-ish to me. These tactics utilized by our esteemed leader are purely community agitator...er....organizer methods......his only skill set. "Oh, oh.......let me do this Rahm. I'll nail it. Booya!"

With the exception of Shia vs Sunni, Shia vs. Sufi, Sunni vs. Sufi.....etc. Protestants vs. Catholics.......wimpy by comparison.

The doctrine has been APPLIED BEYOND the free speech context to such matters as the rights of gays in the military (saying that the mere fact that some heterosexual soldiers may be offended by homosexuality cannot justify discrimination against homosexual soldiers)........Just explaining the mass heckler's veto upon this poor guy from Florida. BTW I do not approve of gays in the military. It's ummmmm....icky

Hardly hon.

Heckler's veto refers to a tricky attempt to limit unpopular speech. Say a very unpopular group wants to hold a parade and asks for a permit. The government isn't allowed to refuse the permit based upon the beliefs of the applicants. But the government denys the permit, saying (and maybe really believing) that it isn't because the government disapproves of the group's message, it's just afraid that so many people will be outraged that there might be violent protests. Can the government deny the permit? Nope. Under the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment, the government may not silence speech based on the reaction (or anticipated reaction) of a hostile audience, unless there is a "clear and present danger" of grave and imminent...