1 - 8
In response to:

The Libertarian Response to Terrorism

qque Wrote: Apr 22, 2013 3:56 AM
According to my calculation, one percent of the Muslims is 16,000,000. That is still a bunch of terrorist supporters.
He went on to claim that “The families of Newtown deserve a vote. The families of Aurora deserve a vote. The families of Oak Creek, and Tucson, and Blacksburg, and the countless other communities – they deserve a simple vote.” When will people learn that “shall not be infringed” means that no one can simply vote to deny law-abiding citizens their right to keep and bear arms?
BO maintained that “Police chiefs are asking our help to get weapons of war and massive ammunition magazines off our streets, because they are tired of being outgunned.” What a farce! Citizens are outgunned by both the government and the criminals on the street. Law-abiding citizens do not have access to automatic weapons as do the police and our government agencies. If semiautomatics are banned and magazine capacity limited, law-abiding citizens will be forced to use 19th century technology to defend themselves against attackers using 21st century firearms technology.
Have you been following the info slowly leaking out regarding the voting fraud in Ohio. He only needed to take that state to swing the election.
The anti-gun lobby would have us use 19th century weapons to defend against villains with 21st century arms. Ignoring our natural right to protect ourselves, the anti-gun mob would put us further behind the curve vis-à-vis criminals, and our own government, by banning semiautomatic weapons. These so called “assault weapons” which Homeland Security calls “self-defense rifles” are the latest technology that law-abiding citizens in the US are currently allowed to own. Banning semiautomatic weapons and limiting magazine capacity affect only law-abiding citizens, not criminals or the government.
More lives are saved by firearms: about 1.5 million people draw guns in self defense in this country. More children are killed on tricycles than are killed by guns....facts but irrelevent. What you call paranoia results from history. Suggest you stludy history.
Are you for reaL? The right to keep and to bear arms is what put the teeth in any constitution. The right to speak freely is only protected by those who are will...and able...to fight for that right. The likes of the ACLU would not be tolerated by a totalitarian government, and a totalitarian government is what you get without the right to keep and to bear arms..
Has any national politician better demonstrated the validity of the Second Amendment? We can stand and laugh at BO’s absurd threats, but he threatens never the less. If we do not concede our rights to him through Congressional action he will attempt to strip these rights by means of his dictatorial machinations. His roots in the Chicago politics of thuggery are again showing. Time to end this “gun debate”: impeach BO and JB for attempting to destroy the constitution and restore our gun rights. No licenses or fees to purchase or carry firearms.
1 - 8
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:42 AM ET