In response to:

Progressive Teacher Pustule: Pay Your School Taxes and Shut Up

pzucker Wrote: Apr 14, 2012 9:58 PM
Why do you right wingers always bring up homosexuality? We aren't even talking about it here, yet this obsession (some might claim want) is at the forefront of the conversation, why?
jmg11 Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 10:11 PM
1. "I think you mean "procreative" sex."
Partly correct and partly wrong, I mean sex and its purposes, one of which is procreation.

Apparently you mean abusing the gift of sex. This unfortunate error will bring you pleasant feelings, sometimes (maybe her, too). Then it will bring you both trouble. One black day, you, too, will learn what trouble you have caused.

2. "When you shoot your wad in her a** is not "sex" by your definition."
Correct; it is sodomy, stimulation of your sex organ by misplacing it in her bumhole, and, more generically, perversion of the gift of sex.

You cannot expect to do well if your philosophical muse is the Marquis de Sade, another bumhole worshipper.
TFT Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 9:53 PM
I think you mean "procreative" sex.

When you shoot your wad in her a** is not "sex" by your definition.
jmg11 Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 7:16 PM
Dear TFT,
Thank you for, "Does putting quotes around the 'sex' part of that word make the word about sex, a thing you feel the need to keep quiet, are embarrassed about, and afraid of?"

I am not embarrassed about sex, I am embarrassed to explain to you, a self-proclaimed public school teacher (I think that less likely with our every exchange), that homo"sex"ual activity is not sex.

So -- The quotes indicate that homo"sex"ual activity is not real sex. It is mere stimulation of the sex organs by another -- not sex at all. It is a perversion of sex; sometimes mutual masturbation, sometimes pederasty.

Nobody has two mommies. Nobody has mastered the feat of emerging from two different vaginas. Oh, maybe I should ask -- Can you do that??
TFT Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 6:15 PM
Does putting quotes around the 'sex' part of that word make the word about sex, a thing you feel the need to keep quiet, are embarrassed about, and afraid of?

You know what happens to kids who live on farms? They understand sex.
TFT Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 6:13 PM
You should explain what is wrong with the syntax.

Talking about homosexuality with kids usually doesn't include the sex act. It's usually about adult same sex partners that you homophobes think is wrong, so the rest of us who are fine with it must combat the silliness when brought up in class.

You know, 2 mommies and all that. Not what organ goes where.

You Puritans have major issues.
TFT Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 6:10 PM
Unless it comes up, which it often does, usually by some kid making a homophobic remark he learned from his parents. Teachers have to validate both the ignorant offender and any victims.
jmg11 Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 4:07 PM
Everyone'sFakes4Us,

Thank you for the useful, "there is certainly little reason to teach it outside of the health class."

There is NO reason whatsoever to teach homo"sex"uality. Now, perhaps you see, but I suppose you must continue to pretend you don't.

jmg11 Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 4:04 PM
"I don't suppot homosexuality any more or les than I do heterosexuality."

You are a little rough on English syntax, there, "teacher." You may or may not really be a teacher (no way to tell through the wire), but your syntax puts you in the middle of the public school teachers of our time.

And to be neutral between homo"sex"uality and heterosexuality allows a determination of your worthiness to lead little children.

everyonesfacts4u Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 7:25 AM
jmg11,
no.
I don't see it.

I am not saying it does not come up in my classroom, but there is certainly little reason to teach it outside of the health class.
TFT Wrote: Apr 15, 2012 1:15 AM
I don't suppot homosexuality any more or les than I do heterosexuality. In younger grades where I have taught it doesn't come up much.

In fact, if you and I were sitting by the fire with beers watching our kids hurt each other, we wouldn't behave much differently. We'd tell them to cut it out, and if they didn't, we would make them.

I am not some freak. Nor are you. Relax.
jmg11 Wrote: Apr 14, 2012 10:08 PM
Because you lefties are so obnoxious about promoting the sacrament of homo"sex"ual action.

Do you see?

EAGnews.org and I continuously poke the belly of the education beast to see what kinds of pustules pop, and it never ceases to amaze us the types of low-lifes involved in our education system.

There are many great teachers – we work with a lot of them every day. But there are also a lot of people who don’t deserve the honor of teaching our children.

Whether it’s union-defended “pervy” teachers getting a slap on the wrist for very serious offenses, teachers doctoring student test scores for their own gain, or teachers union officials involved...