In response to:

RNC Chief: Did the Media Miss Planned Parenthood's Endorsement of Infanticide?

PurpleStateBlueVote Wrote: Apr 03, 2013 11:32 PM
As for no discussion of gestational age - neither side is interested in that at the moment. Like it or not, your side would have to make the first move. Your side has adopted the very successful tactic of curbing abortion in bits in pieces and no one on my side will offer another piece to your side. Not until your side makes it clear that the ultimate goal is to prevent abortion of fetuses past a certain gestational age, not abortion in all cases (the platform of the Republican party, lest you forget). There wouldn't even be a problem with making that gestational age cutoff very low. But the offer by your side has to be in good faith.
AliveInHim Wrote: Apr 03, 2013 11:43 PM
What could possibly justify tearing an unborn child to pieces?

His father is a criminal? His mother's an irresponsible twit?

Not one of us asked to be born. Not one. Some of us had it pretty rough growing up, but here we are, better off than we were and damn grateful to be alive.

An insidious form of media bias stems from what our press decides isn't worthy of coverage.  In a column at Red State, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus decries American journalism's relative silence on the stunning testimony of a Planned Parenthood official in Florida last week.  Asked if a child who survived an attempted abortion has a right not to be killed post-birth, Alisa Lapolt Snow repeatedly invoked a mother's right to choose, declining to state whether the newborn should be protected under law.  Here's her ghoulish exchange with lawmakers:
 

...