In response to:

Report: Romney Tax Proposals Definitively Better for Economic Growth Than Obama's

psydoc Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 7:51 PM
trickles up to us. But...wait, then we pay taxes to pay for those roads, bridges, schools, welfare, etc. If after that, there is money left, we get to enjoy the rewards of all the risks. We get to enjoy income in return for OUR risk. YOU HAD NO RISK. You all received benefits, first, and now you AXXHOLES have the nerve to resent what WE created. You PsOS. You are un-American. Go form your own communist country, enjoy having nothing. Go ahead and ban me TH, I am tired of hear this dribble form the leftist trolls. They have no understanding of reality.
psydoc Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 9:07 PM
Thanks, sylvia, I have lived it all my life. ;)
sylvia55 Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 8:04 PM
Profit to them is a dirty word...they don't realize it is the oil that is re-invested to run the machines!!

Great comments...you understand it so well!!
A report out yesterday from the non-partisan Tax Foundation analyzes Barack Obama and Mitt Romney's tax plans side-by-side and comes to the conclusion that a President Romney would be much better for economic growth than a second Obama term - and indeed, if President Obama's policy proposals were instituted as law, economic growth would actually be worse than current law projections.


Source: Tax Foundation

In contrast to the Tax Policy Center, the Tax Foundation's model doesn't take Romney's revenue-neutrality pledge as definitive. Thus, the report finds that the Romney plan would increase...

Friday, May 24 | 12:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 12:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 12:30 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 12:30 PM ET