1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Anchor America Deserves

Primus54 from Ohio Wrote: Feb 12, 2015 11:21 AM
Clearly satire. Take a read in Mr. Hunter's archives and you'll understand.
bsmith526 Wrote:2 mins ago (1:45 PM): "The reason your model is flawed is that 6 years is a ridiculously short period of observation and the fact that you are simply measuring on spot is far too limited to give us any usable information as to what is happening globally." --------------------------- And yet, anytime there is some so-called "disaster" (snow storms in the winter, heat waves in the summer...lol!), there is always some AGW truther on TV talking about how it is an indicator of AGW. You people are your own worst enemies.
In response to:

Into the Lion’s Den

Primus54 from Ohio Wrote: Feb 02, 2015 1:18 PM
McGovern, I suspect "tinsldr2" was once in the armed forces, and unlike most veterans who are quiet & modest about their service, there are always a few who have to elevate their experience above those who didn't serve. Perhaps their professional lives "peaked" in their 20s and they need something to feel superior about.
In response to:

Into the Lion’s Den

Primus54 from Ohio Wrote: Feb 02, 2015 12:07 PM
Tinsldr2 Wrote:1 hour ago (10:24 AM): "No, Where's the RISK to him? He cant even be fired from his job." ---------------------------- Do you really believe Dr. Adams' professorship is his sole source of income? He takes professional risks that can have a negative effect on his reputation as does anyone who dares speak in public forums on highly controversial subjects... especially when the audience is likely to be hostile. Since when are risky endeavors limited to the military, cops & firefighters?
Your reliance on a single graph produced by agencies that are politically influenced by AGW proponents is telling. You should be more interested in scientific discourse attempting to disprove your theory... that's the way real science USED to work.
Excellent comment, RodT. The problem with these people who are always looking for a major problem to "solve" (i.e., "libs/progs/socialists") is that they have a real blind spot when it comes to consideration of unintended consequences or alternatives if their great plans don't work out or their assumptions are just plain wrong.
There are many arguments that can be made to counter what has become a religion to global climate change enthusiasts. There are a couple that provides a real conundrum for them: These people act as though the last couple of hundred years global temperatures are the "ideal" temperatures, and that any warming above these averages are "bad". How come the temperatures from the 10th century aren't "ideal"? If the seas rise a couple feet, property that sits at today's water's edge will likely disappear. Guess what? We'll adapt... just as man has always adapted to geological and geographic change. It isn't going to happen overnight. The second BIG problem is the hypocrisy of the so-called "leaders" of the climate change movement. Many of them produce 10 to 20 times the average carbon output of the average person. Private jets, fleets of SUVs, multiple residences, etc. When "experts" want to persuade you to spend your money, it is good practice to pay little heed to what they SAY.... pay attention to what they DO.
There you go again... Isn't it interesting to note that so many of the extreme temperature records that get broken are from the 19th and early 20th centuries? What was causing all that "warming" before the industrial revolution?
"Responding to inquiries about the document, the DEA said that the monitoring of gun shows was merely a proposal and was never implemented." -------------------------------- I have no problem with law enforcement acting upon reasonable suspicion combined with common sense. For example, I fully expect police to target known drug areas to reduce the sale of illegal drugs. But to simply create a database on the possibility that a crime might be committed is a bridge too far. What's next? Install license plate readers at every establishment that serves alcohol on the assumption that sooner or later a patron will drive intoxicated?
Hmmm... let's see: 1. Obama unilaterally acts in defiance of existing law on immigration and declares 4 to 5 million illegals exempt from deportation. 2. Obama continues to remind Congress that he has a pen and a phone and will act by executive action on anything he deems them negligent based upon HIS ideology... NOT the will of the majority. 3. Obama pledges his willingness to find common ground with Congress... while he threatens to veto anything contrary to his whim. In response, Boehner invites Netanyahu to address Congress without first asking His Majesty Obama for permission... and according to the MSM, it is Boehner who upset the apple cart. Yep, "normalcy" reigns in D.C., thanks to the Ministry of Propaganda, aka, MSM.
1 - 10 Next