1 - 3
#1. Most American adults have a high school diploma--or better. Picking veggies for dishonest American farmers is not the kind of job said Americans have their sights set on. I worked the fields around my Oregon hometown during my high schoo years. Am I lazy to have chosen a better paying career after graduation? #2. Despite what the ignorant among us us believe, foreign laborers do not have to immigrate here to work here. Guest worker programs permit non-immigrant workers to work here temporarily. Look up the H2A visa.
"They" are not "extrremists" who have hijacked the "religion of peace". Nor are they "terrorists" or "radicalized" Muslims. They are Muslim literalists who believe (1) the Qur'an is God's literal word and (2) that according to God, Muslims are the best of people---making them superior to all others. (Before you leap to your keyboards to tell me that Allah and God are not the same deity--Muslims believe they are!). O'Reilly asked if it was a "terror" attack. That's what Obama responded to, and is a primary reason why the incident has been so lied about. Obama even said "by definition...when somebody is attacking our compound, that's an act of terror." Really? Like the terror a bank teller feels during an armed robbery? Or, if it's being attacked by a foreign government? C'mon. Let's drop the useless euphemisms and call it what it was...an act of violent jihad! American adults deserve to be told the truth about Islam
Obama danced around O'Reilly's "terror" question because that's the word he needed to do his tapdance. The PC euphemisms terror, terrorists, and terrorism have almost completed the task of removing references to Islam, Muslim(s), Qur'an, sharia'ah, and caliphate from the West's lexicon. "Terror" has now come to mean Jihad, without using the word. And because clueless BillO used that descritption instead of the jiahd being waged around the world by Muslim literalists, Obama had the out he needed...to talk about "terror" instead of violent jihad. And tap dance he did.
1 - 3