In response to:

Squealing Versus Killing

poorgrandchildren.com2 Wrote: Jun 14, 2012 8:41 AM
Did Obummer leak the information to look macho or did a whistle blower do so to stop him? It makes a difference, but not as to whether one power-hungry narcissist has illegally declared war.
Bob62 Wrote: Jun 14, 2012 5:22 PM
It DOES make a difference, in house. The problem is it didn't stop him, in fact he's proud of it... He and WAYYYYY to many Americans think that Obama's "hunting with the intent to kill human beings" is a good thing... America has ALWAYS been WAYYYY above that, at least on the surface...
Obama should have denied ALL claims that he is doing what he is doing... it's all so preposturous, that loads of us would think it was bunk political posturing... But evidently it's all true, and that is bad for us in so many ways...

If you are still listening to those in the political class who are falling over each other to condemn leaks from the government to the media, you'd think the leaks had revealed private information in which the public has no legitimate interest, or perhaps a planned secret government mission to rescue innocents. Neither is the case.

Republicans and Democrats in Congress, most of them from the House and Senate intelligence committees, have blasted the White House for leaking to The New York Times and others the existence of President Obama's secret kill list and his cyber-warfare against Iran. According to...