In response to:

Michelle Obama's "Food Deserts," Aren't Actually Food Deserts

PMcQB Wrote: Apr 19, 2012 3:44 PM
Does it bother you that much that many prefer personal accountability instead of a nanny state which forces ALL to do something because some aren't responsible enough?

As part of her big-brother-knows-best "Let's Move!" campaign to combat childhood obesity, Michelle Obama has been arguing that certain inner-city urban neighborhoods and rural communities are "food deserts," where it's difficult for residents to find access to fresh, healthy, and nutritious food. Mrs. Obama's solution is for the federal government to funnel public money (or, as her esteemed husband might faultily term it, "make an investment") into bringing healthy food retailers into these neighborhoods. But, as with many centrally-planned nanny-state endeavors, the First Lady's taxpayer-funded project fails to attack the real core of the problem, ignores secondary effects,...