1 - 10 Next
Might say that. :) Even Clinton would look good compared to obama.
In response to:

Holder's Chutzpah

PMcQB Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 12:05 PM
"Every race is capable on its own." Then there's no need for affirmative action.
In response to:

Holder's Chutzpah

PMcQB Wrote: Jun 01, 2012 11:56 AM
Many of the people who argue against needing photo IDs to vote seem to argue against needing one to get a bottle of port.
When my friends accuse me of being a stubborn republican, I remind them that I voted for Clinton the second time. Didn't agree with him on everything, but things were going pretty well - unlike now.
I can't help but remember years ago when katie couric (still on today I believe) interviewed Laura Bush. I can't remember what was discussed, but I do remember that couric had a hard time hiding her disgust - she never smiled one time the entire interview (remember, this is "perky katie). Now, if she were to interview michelle obama, she would hardly be able to talk because of the giant fawning smile frozen on her face. Media bias? Nah, that's just something we make up.
From the "absolutely nothing to do with anything" department.
In response to:

Meet a New Civil Rights Heroine

PMcQB Wrote: May 30, 2012 9:56 AM
If the progs hate her, she must be doing something right. Good for her.
"16) Do you know how SAD it would make Chris Matthews if Obama lost? How could you do that to him?" Chrissy's leg would go numb.
Where would Title IX proponents come down in the case of those like "Jennifer?"
Forget it Buck and Don, he/she/it said "LOL", therefore we're wrong, and should just concede.
1 - 10 Next