Join the Debate!
All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.
Login in to Post Your Comments
ZealousConscript Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 11:05 AM
I realize that you probably didn't mean it that way, but the military isn't a charity. In fact, the US could save a tremendous amount of money by cutting military expenditures, such as the amount we spend on private military contractors http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2010/02/27-defense-regulations-singer . The money we spend on defense contractors, instead of using our military resources, is several orders of magnitude higher than 'big bird'. Of course, if you mean supporting veterans, I wholeheartedly agree. Unfortunately Republicans tend not to http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/19/875351/republicans-kill-vets-job-bill/?mobile=nc
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
pmccomb Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 4:54 PM
That is where you are very wrong. Do you have your facts to prove that. I do support disable veterans and many people support military that I know so you can not say that with out facts. My husband brothers nephew father all served in the military did you? Or do you just go off running your mouth off.
Login to Reply
Flag as Offensive
Post Comment
There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep...
Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud