In response to:

Hillary Clinton's Dodgy Testimony

PJ58 Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 2:09 AM
This is so obvious it hurts. Johnson should have come back extremely hard immediately. Mrs Secretary, these hearings are about YOU, and these hearings are about the administration who for two weeks told the American people, the video was the direct cause of the killing of four Americans, and it makes a world of a difference Madam Secretary if you told the truth or if you Madam Secretary adequately did your job, because if you did not do either of those things Madam Secretary, it matters very much and there are serious consequences to not telling the truth or because of your incompetence four Americans were killed. You may pound the table and be outraged all you want but we will get to the bottom of this Madam Secretary, Yes It Matters.
Joan383 Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 9:58 AM
So PJ, what would it take to get you in the Senate? Rand Paul did an admirable job, but again, the quesion is, what was the Ambassador doing there? Who was he meeting with and why? I have a feeling it was for treasonous reasons that could be actionable all the way to the Oval Office.

A lot of people in Washington apparently forgot how good Hillary Clinton is at not telling the truth.

Wednesday, in her testimony before both the Senate and, later, the House, Clinton brilliantly fudged, dodged and filibustered. Of course, she's a pro. Clinton was slow-walking depositions, lawyering up and shifting blame when many of her questioners were still civilians down on the farm.

Aided by a ridiculous format, she outfoxed most of the Republicans with ease.

Meanwhile, the Democrats, almost uniformly, seemed singularly interested in celebrating Mrs. Clinton as a global diva who somehow manages to carry the burden of her awesomeness...