Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Live Free or Move

pismobreak Wrote: May 08, 2013 5:57 PM
"Strict and proper reading of the Constitution"????? It means what it means. You are correct; the federal government does not have power in the area of employment laws precisely because it is not expressly granted in the document . . . that power is left to the states. If you believe the feds should have that power, then AMEND the Constitution! You can't just dismiss the four-corners, obvious meaning of the document and wink-wink, do what you want anyway. Oh, I forgot, you can because you are smarter than the rest of us dummies who have sworn to protect the document.
In response to:

Drone Double Standard

pismobreak Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 12:52 PM
The linguistic gymnastics being used to justify the legality of the assassination of these particular American citizens is simply laying the ground work for the use of deadly force against Tea Party members or other "right wing terrorist" threats at the whim of dear leader Obama.
In response to:

Gun Control Takes Center Stage

pismobreak Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 1:01 PM
It is being spent on the bullet train.
There is no such thing as "federal money!" It's money taken from taxpayers and used on illegal, read un-constitutional, federal programs. This madness must stop.
In response to:

Biden's Faulty Lifeguard Logic

pismobreak Wrote: Jan 11, 2013 6:17 PM
Biden uses faulty logic? Whoda thunk it?
In response to:

What's Wrong with the GOP?

pismobreak Wrote: Jan 07, 2013 10:37 AM
"Right wing ideologues" . . . ????? What does that mean? Does it mean if you support the Constitution you are "right wing?" Does it mean if you don't support the previous 100 years of re-writing the Constitution through judicial fiat you are "right wing?" Does it mean if you understand the history behind the adoption of the Constitution through the study of readily-available source documents you are "right wing?" You, sir, are a left wing extremist attempting to justify our extra-constitutional coversion from a nation of law to a nation ruled by man-made law.
In response to:

What's Wrong with the GOP?

pismobreak Wrote: Jan 07, 2013 10:27 AM
I can't wait for the demise of this disorganized bunch of big-government losers. Rather than being principled, constitutionally faithful protectors of our liberty-loving legacy, they twitter to and fro, paying lip service to our founding ideals; only concerned with looking good on television and getting re-elected. Good riddance.
In response to:

Romney's Middle-class Problem

pismobreak Wrote: Oct 11, 2012 5:53 PM
"Since Romney insists "there'll be no tax cut that adds to the deficit," he needs to make up for the lost revenue by cutting back on tax breaks . . ." I too am a Libertarian, however, why does Mr. Sullum resort to the arguments of the left, by basically saying that the tax cuts must be paid for by making up revenue from somewhere other source? Revenue will be "made up" through economic growth. As an author with a libertarian bent, I would think he would be able to see through the specious arguments of the statists and understand that reducing the un-constitutional reach of the giant central government will be all the "stimulus" we need to start growing again.
In response to:

True Patriots

pismobreak Wrote: Oct 11, 2012 1:46 PM
You have just described Obama and his war-loving policies.
In response to:

Last Recourse of Failed Presidents

pismobreak Wrote: Sep 05, 2012 11:19 AM
Pat says, "How does Obama unite and lead the country should he win?" The answer is, it doesn't matter to Obama. He is not interested in uniting and building consensus. He is interested only in advancing his socialist/statist agenda and amassing power in continued, brazen defiance of the Constitution. His use of executive orders to override and disembowel congressional legislation proves his comtempt for our governing document. Its all about fundamental change. He didn't lie about it, he didn't spend a lot of time hiding it . . . the electorate simply ignored it. Lord help us.
In response to:

The Rich Don't Pay Enough?

pismobreak Wrote: Aug 29, 2012 6:18 PM
First, when you are writing about our Constitution, you capitalize it . . . Freudian slip indicating you not only don't respect our governing document, but you also have never read it! Secondly, only Karl Marx guarantees equality of outcome, not the Constitution. Our federal republican democracy, limited by the explicit rules outlined in the Constitution, simply provides equality of opportunity. "Go Foward with Obama"? Sorry, he, like you, are leftist extremists bent on destroying the country our Founders created.
Previous 21 - 30 Next