In response to:

Why Bill Clinton Is All Wet

Phoenomagus Wrote: Sep 11, 2012 6:00 PM
Clinton has presented himself as the exact opposite of Obama. Where Obama blames those before him for the problems he inherited, Clinton takes credit for many things he had little to do with when he was in office. Economic forces and shift occur in a much longer cycle than a presidential term. Just because you happen to be in office does NOT mean it was YOUR accomplishment. History will remember Clinton as one of the worst in history, both for things he did not do and his overall conduct.
Snarkasterous1 Wrote: Sep 11, 2012 8:02 PM
Not if that history is penned by liberals, who worship Clinton.

To libbies, there's simply no hypocrisy in continuing to laud a man that shoved a cigar up a naive young intern IN THE WHITE HOUSE after having called for the immediate disgrace and firing of Bob Packwood, who committed the apparently far worse act of aggressively kissing women.

Um, right. THAT describes a truly principled position by members of the party that "respects women."

- Snark

The Clinton line, an elaboration of Obama excuse No. 37 for the dismal economy (after the Arab Spring, ATMs, the euro crisis and tomato blight in Mrs. Obama's White House garden), goes like this: The economy was so damaged by George W. Bush-era policies that "no president" could have been expected to do better than the record-high poverty, staggering unemployment, shrinking workforce participation, anemic growth and gargantuan debt over which Barack Obama has presided.

We're asked to believe that the Obama administration knew all along that things would take longer than four years to improve. "I never said this journey...