In response to:

Obama's Bain Attacks Could Backfire

Phil Byler Wrote: May 28, 2012 8:07 AM
There is a defense for Bain, but Mr. Barone's column seems to paint with too broad a brush. The fact Romney had left Bain at the time the subject company did the criticized layoffs did not resonate and should not have. The subject company was acquired when Romney was at Bain; after Romney left Bain, he was still on the SEC filings; and Bain did at thesubject company what private equity firms do. The defense is that in free markets, a private equity firm can come in and save an otherwise faltering company. The sense that Bain is part of the freedom we want is why the Bain attacks are failing. That sense overrides any concern that in a few occasions, private equity firms have engaged in what is called vulture capitalism.

The ham-handed Barack Obama campaign attack ads on Mitt Romney's former firm Bain Capital have drawn a lot of ire from other Democrats.

And not just because they were sloppily fact-checked (the ads hit Romney for layoffs long after he left Bain) and because a leading Obama money bundler is a Bain executive himself.

Chiming in with various degrees of disapproval were Newark, N.J., Mayor Cory Booker ("nauseating"), former Rep. Harold Ford, Obama car czar Steven Rattner, Sen. Mark Warner and former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell.

There are other signs of unease among Democratic elites. Obama contributions...

Tuesday, June 18 | 12:26 AM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 12:26 AM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 12:26 AM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 12:26 AM ET