1 - 10 Next
The Obama administration isn't interested in cutting fat they are interesting in cutting bone to increase pain on the public. I guess what I am saying is that we shouldn't be surprised the Sequester didn't get rid of the bloat in Washington because that is not what the WH wants to do. They want to keep the bloat for their future Democrat power in Washington so if anything they are insulating it from sequester.
In response to:

Poll: Reagan 58, Obama 42

pga301 Wrote: Apr 12, 2013 10:38 AM
Just a comment for all the Obama lovers. You feel compelled to comment on a poll that Reagan would beat Obama on a right wing site? Talk about insecurity. I would guess you ALL know how badly your policies are going and that your political cult is a bubble that WILL burst if anyone starts to finally doubt that Emperor Obama has no clothes. It the only explanation for your massive drive to defend Obama as the one and only Messiah that has no faults.
In response to:

Poll: Reagan 58, Obama 42

pga301 Wrote: Apr 12, 2013 10:29 AM
It means a lot that Reagan could crush Obama. It means that people were willing to look past party label and vote for the prosperity that Reagan represents and against the failure of Obama in 2012. It represents that Obama has a cult following that if any Republican could have convinced the public of their plan for prosperity they could have defeated him. It means that the the Dead Reagan who didn't have the Obama MSM and millionaires and billionaires donating to his propaganda machine he could not have won on his record if anybody on the right could have emphasized that along WITH his cowardice at Benghazi.
In response to:

4 Reasons Jason Lewis Can Beat Al Franken

pga301 Wrote: Apr 08, 2013 3:30 PM
Both Franken and Dayton won a THREE way race. They both got about 42% of the actual vote and that is about how many hard core Democrats there are in the state. The other 58% are up for grabs and this is not that different a State than the one that had a Republican Governor elected in 2006. If the lame Independence Party finally DIES the Republicans will pick up a LOT of support and Lewis actually is a good fit for those people who went third party before when Franken ran.
In response to:

CPAC Unwise to Snub Christie, Gays

pga301 Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 6:53 PM
So Jonah you want to create either a conflict which isn't good for the GOP or some kind of leg-humping where Christie gets to spit in our eye and we have to love him for it? The simple solution to feuding parties (pardon the pun) is to keep them separate. If Christie wants to have a rally or run for President people can VOLUNTARILY show up but CPAC isn't there so people can crash it who have been giving the finger to conservatives to pump their approval rating. Face it Jonah we ALL in the grassroots know why you want Christie to be forgiven don't we. Much like Romney you think the NE Republican is the key to getting the WH back and you really don't care what the man does to the grassroots if that happens.
In response to:

Better Republican Communication Needed

pga301 Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 9:09 PM
When did Townhall become liberal troll central? God was idiotic comments they have that aren't even on topic. Does name calling ever get tiring for you clowns? Do you really think you are making coverts with that? What proof what loser liberals are.
In response to:

Better Republican Communication Needed

pga301 Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 9:06 PM
I am tired of hearing we need a new communications strategy. We live in a country where people are free to ignore you. They DO catch things from the MS mostly containing Obama. That is what THEY permit themselves to be informed with. I get sick of pundit who prattle about communications with people who DO NOT listen to Republican communication. What these people understand is if their lives are interrupted and they HAVE to try and figure out whose right. If you aren't willing to shutdown the government then you really aren't going to get the attention of these people.
In response to:

In Defense of Chris Christie

pga301 Wrote: Feb 27, 2013 11:25 PM
You are not doing yourself any favors guy by defending Christie as if the REST OF US desperately need him. I really don't get that if Christie screws the rest of us we have to embrace him whatever the reason is you give about party harmony. I guess we can't have any standards since we didn't win in November with a candidate a lot of us weren't excited about. We are supposed to line up and out of blind loyalty sell our souls for whatever a blue state Northeast Republican has to do in screwing us to prove himself to liberals in his home state. Sorry Guy that is not America. It is a hostage situation where we all are hostage to the fact Christie can get elected in a blue state? F*** THAT!!
In response to:

Attack of the Uppity Conservative Hispanics

pga301 Wrote: Feb 25, 2013 11:20 AM
I would point out they still fear their status as Latino. The Democrat party has a huge investment in the "old White Men" smear of the Republican party. Much like Palin, when a figure appears where they can't shut out the ears of the members of the Democrat Planatation with the simple "He's just a white man you have nothing in common with", they panic. Like Palin these guys have a deadly combo for Liberals 1) They aren't White Men 2) They are apologetically stating conservatism. I somewhat disagree with the author that it isn't BOTH!
It's funny that you hear not a peep about cracking the black vote in all the articles about Latinos being wooed by Republicans. If you concede that blacks vote for a certain reason democrat why can't it also be true for latinos to a lesser degree.
1 - 10 Next
Sunday, May 19 | 12:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:06 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 12:06 AM ET