In response to:

Four More Years of Decline

Petya Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 1:35 PM
Hahahaha! Hitler couldn't take Moscow in 1941, how the flip would he take it in 1942? And even if he did - so What? Napoleon took Moscow, so flipping what??? Soviet government already had plans to move to Kuibishev, loss of Moscow wouldn't mean much. But Hitler still couldn't take it. In fact, under Moscow he got such severe beating, that he never attempted again. You know why he went to Stalingrad? Because he had no oil. Read German high command diaries- they didn't even have enough fuel for their very few tanks and planes. Yet here come clowns like you and Milt37, and open your big fat mouths about some ridiculous transcontinental bombers (that didn't even exist on paper). yeah, sure!
Kimbery Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 1:41 PM
The Panzer and Tiger were two of the best tanks prodcued in the war. Saying they didn't have decent takes is blatant ignorance.
Petya Wrote: Nov 08, 2012 1:37 PM
Hitler didn't have enough alluminum or steel to build decent tanks, he didn't have enough oil to fuel what little equipment did he have.

Yet here come clowns like Kimberly and talk about the possibility of "EASILY", that's E-A-S-I-L-Y winning the war.

And that - clownhallers - is the sample of your intelligence.
Great nations and proud empires have always collapsed from within before they were conquered from without.

President Obama's re-election mirrors the self-indulgent, greedy and envious nation we are rapidly becoming.

Pollsters Michael Barone and Dick Morris got it horribly wrong. Both predicted a 300 electoral-vote win for Romney. It was President Obama who reached that mark.

The central message coming out of the election seems to be that we are no longer the America of our Founders, or even the America that existed during World War II, which produced our "greatest generation."

Instead, the election validates the...