In response to:

Behind Obama's Falling Economic Poll Numbers

Petrus64 Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 6:51 PM
"Good or bad Pet? " I gave you an answer. Murder is immoral. How come you're lost on that? Is it because you have no moral compass yourself? That seems to be the most likely explanation.
Simplecaveman Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 6:56 PM
Okay Petrus, maybe murder. But is putting people in gas chambers, pulling out their gold and silver fillings, running abhorrent human tests, giving them as minimal amount of food as possible to barely keep them alive considered immoral? To an average human being, absolutely. I'm not sure if LJC is average.
Petrus64 Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 7:00 PM
He cannot even distinguish between killinf and murdering. So, he is below average.

btw, two of those four above...sounds like obama. EPA running tests on humans, food stamps to have just enough food to keep you imprisoned. It's only a matter of time for the gold. And the 'mass' elimination is certainly on the Weathermen Underground agenda (friends of Ayers and all).
Simplecaveman Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 7:06 PM
Great comparison Petrus. Never really considered that.

According to the NYT's 538 blog, President Obama'sa popular advantage over Republicans on the economy has basically evaporated (http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/23/obama-has-lost-advantage-over-g-o-p-on-economy/?hp).

There are a number of plausible reasons for this development, as the post points out, and some of them are innocuous. But there's a big potential reason, that -- not surprisingly -- goes politely unmentioned.

Could it be than, in the aftermath of his sequester overreach, many Americans simply no longer believe President Obama's explanations when it comes to the economy? I think that's entirely possible, but there's more to it even than that.  Every day the sequester drags on and...