In response to:

Mitt Video an Opportunity, Not a Scandal

percen Wrote: Sep 21, 2012 6:37 AM
-itism to decide who gets Fed-Grant-$ "BH-Obama-Comnst-Marxst-Socialst-Chicgo-Dem-Machine-Politician !" washingtonexaminer.com/introduction-the-obama-you-dont-know/article/2508080 chapter-i-a-childhood-of-privilege-not-hardship/article/2508416 ii-the-myth-of-the-rock-star-professor/article/2508418 iii-the-1997-speech-that-launched-obama/article/2508419 iv-for-the-slumlords-defense-barack-obama-esq./article/2508420 v-obamas-toughest-critics-on-the-left/article/2508421 vi-the-poor-people-obama-left-behind/2508422 vii-the-myth-of-obama-as-state-senate-reformer/article/2508423 viii-obamas-state-pension-scheme/article/2508424 ix-the-arab-american-network-behind-obama/article/2508425 x-obama-brings-chicago-politics-to-washington/article/2508417
So what about the Democrats' would-be tempest about Mitt Romney's alleged 47 percent gaffe? Is there any "there" there?

Mitt's statement was made at a private fundraiser, where he was trying to explain that his message of reducing taxes would obviously not resonate with the 47 percent of Americans who are not paying income taxes. It's purely logical; you aren't going to entice those who aren't paying taxes with promises of lower taxes.

The statement was hardly shocking or unique. For years, we've heard the axiom that once the body politic of any nation freely votes itself...