In response to:

Those Cheapened Pulitzer 'Prizes'

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 25, 2012 11:34 AM
Let me check your pulse. Miller is not only eminently funny and entertaining, he is brilliant - something one cannot say about Maher. Maher is stagnant tripe, worn out mantra screeder, a pretender-comedian. And a hater, to boot.
The Obama Timeline author Wrote: Apr 25, 2012 3:19 PM
...and Miller does not have to pay women to keep company with him!
The Obama Timeline author Wrote: Apr 25, 2012 3:19 PM
...and Miller does not have to pay women to keep company with him!
The Obama Timeline author Wrote: Apr 25, 2012 3:19 PM
...and Miller does not have to pay women to keep company with him!
midfielder2 Wrote: Apr 25, 2012 12:05 PM
That's why the libs love him. They don't care if he's actually funny, he spouts their line of crap and they laugh at it like good little lemmings.
Once upon a time, it meant something for a reporter to be called a "Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist." The prestige of this designation is quickly eroding. The 2012 Pulitzer Prizes looked less like an excellence-in-media competition and more like an exercise in leftist self-affirmation. No prize established this more strongly than the coveted National Reporting prize going to ... The Huffington Post.

The Pulitzer judges who would rather swallow rat poison than give an award to a conservative outlet, such as The Washington Times, are bestowing kudos on a site that thrives on such celebrity dreck as "Miley Shows Off Legs in...