Previous -2 - 4
In response to:

For the Love of Marx

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 4:03 PM
If not (in your little vacuous bubble world), then who?
In response to:

For the Love of Marx

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 4:03 PM
If not (in your little vacuous bubble world), then who?
In response to:

For the Love of Marx

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 4:02 PM
Indeed, Charles the Hammer. It is a reduction of humanity to an economic determinism that would make any behaviorist proud as a peach. So much for freedom...you're economically determined.
In response to:

For the Love of Marx

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 3:57 PM
Well said. Isn't it funny how theorists are always OUTSIDE their own theories. They always apply to everyone else, save the theorist himself.
In response to:

For the Love of Marx

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 3:51 PM
Your astonishing arrogance is only exceeded by your vitriol. Would you tell Jonah Goldberg, or George Will, or Charles Krauthammer, or William F. Buckley, or...that they are "dumb conservatives"? For if you would, then dumb is as dumb does. Your swagger doesn't impress me in the least. Get a clue: some intellectuals are conservatives. Swallow that and then blog it out wherever the hell you blog.
In response to:

For the Love of Marx

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 3:18 PM
What's amazing is the fact that the left are always screaming that the right throws out terms like Marxism, communism, without really knowing what they actually mean. Seems to me folks on this page have a darn good idea as to what they mean. :)
In response to:

For the Love of Marx

Perapiteticus Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 3:18 PM
What's amazing is the fact that the left are always screaming that the right throws out terms like Marxism, communism, without really knowing what they actually mean. Seems to me folks on this page have a darn good idea as to what they mean. :)
Previous -2 - 4