Does a writer have to write "anthropogenic global warming" to get it through your head what he means? The idea conveyed in the article, which IS supported directly by Dr. Brooks, is that there is little reason to infer a cause and effect relationship between climate change (anthropogenic or natural) and strength of weather events. The claim is NOT supported by the data. Sheesh.

vlazsi is too busy having a conversation with himself on another thread. Must be getting paid a few cents for every post.

I had to re-read the statement before I processed the utter nonsense spoken by this democrat. Read it again.

3

Amen! Amen! Amen!

Me too. Never heard of her before reading this column, but I was associating the name with another McCarthy...Charlie the empty- headed puppet. Now that I think about it, there are more similarities. Has never had an original thought. Has no moral convictions. Will be left alone and neglected when men are through using her. How truly sad.

This one is a keeper. It illustrates perfectly the absurd arguments of the pro-abortion crowd.

And your comments are relevant to the article in what way?

Excellent observation.

There is a way to get ABC-NBC-CBS-NYT-NPR-CNN-WASHPO-LAT to ask the President challenging questions: elect a Republican. Works every time.