Previous 11 - 20 Next
Actually it would, because I guarantee those folks are paying in cash.
In response to:

Nanny State Targets Grocery Stores

peezie Wrote: Jul 19, 2014 10:03 AM
Actually i agree with the idea of training people on food stamps to make better decisions. More often than not, they're buying junk which not only makes them less healthy, but less motivated to get off the gubmint cheese. But, if the government chooses to implement this, they can pay for it, not the retailers.
If that was the stupidest line ever uttered by a US president, choosing that one from Obama must have been the toughest choice ever made by a commentator. There are just so many to choose from.
I'd rather not think about that region of her body in nay context.
Reid and Pelosi represent unprecedented levels of evil in government.
If this was an issue of keeping certain personnel in place to protect more adjacent embassies et al, why was this not said at the outset? Most would understand that, because if we truly didn't have effective force support in the Benghazi region we simply didn't. All the administration had to do was say so, admit failure to protect these guys and move on. The problem here is the coverup, BS about a film etc -- all made up to protect Obama's re-election chances. Obama simply didn't want another instance of displaying poor decision making or leadership skills.
I hate delving into conspiracy theories, but I find the unprecedented termination of high-ranking military officers since Obama's first election and how it dovetails with things like this quite interesting. I can't -- sadly -- trust the word of the officers involved here. I think they think or have been told their careers are on the line for not towing the party line. I get national security yaddayadda, but since we know administration officials will not be forthcoming, we have to rely on honorable soldiers to tell us what really occurred. I think they're being pressured not to.
It's like black libs attacking black conservatives for not being "authentic" (sic: afenik). It's whether or not they tow the party line. If not, they're under attack also. Just like the former Soviet Union, it's party first.
In response to:

Federal Judge to Supreme Court: 'STFU'

peezie Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 1:43 PM
As a tax payer, he does.
In response to:

Federal Judge to Supreme Court: 'STFU'

peezie Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 1:43 PM
The liberals that thought up abortion would agree with you. After all, its original intent was to cull and reduce the black population. Didn't learn that from your straw-haired Birkenstock-wearing "professor" did you?
Still doesn't mean he hates them. Also doesn't make his assertions inaccurate.
Previous 11 - 20 Next