1 - 10 Next
In response to:

BREAKING: Romney Says He Will Not Run in 2016

PCL Wrote: 21 hours ago (4:50 PM)
Why can't you be kinder for a man of integrity, ( not for his sakes, but yours as one from our side of the party). He will not go away. He has something to offer to the country even without a title. I had preferred him not to run, but I respect him for his personal character. Calling people cowards is fashionable, for certain people.
In response to:

BREAKING: Romney Says He Will Not Run in 2016

PCL Wrote: 21 hours ago (4:42 PM)
"Republicans should just let another Democrat win and let the people see what horrible hardship is coming". No way, please. Can't go lower. "They" will never see their faults, will not learn from harship past, now, and coming. Better work on hoping for a good candidate and supporting him/her. There wont be a perfect one, but will change the tide of destruction.
In response to:

BREAKING: Romney Says He Will Not Run in 2016

PCL Wrote: 22 hours ago (4:36 PM)
You brought out something voters generally do. Go for someone when he becomes popular because of a speech, or one performance. We need to examine the candidates for overall ability to lead. Even Ben Carson, we need to find out more.
In response to:

BREAKING: Romney Says He Will Not Run in 2016

PCL Wrote: 22 hours ago (4:30 PM)
You can be a little kinder. It took him some selfless effort to withdraw. We should applaud him for that. Didn't he say the country need a conservative leader?
Great informative reporting. Facts before punditry.
Ths article is paradoxical, but then some points are meant to be so since Michael is a political humorist. i want to approach this from a serious side because I feel like screaming about the hypocrisy of the left. Most attention is given to whether Sony should or should not enforce the contract with theaters to show the movie. Sony is allowing theater owners to make that decision and neglect the big question of Cyber Attack and the Sensitivity issue. They pull the movie for their own reasons: to avoid lawsuits should terrors make good on their threats,to avoid further exposure of embarrassing emails, to avoid employee lawsuits should more damage is done due to computer security breach; protecting free speech is not high on their list. so stop talking about free speech. Unfortunately, many Americans of influence are spoiled, wilful, individuals who want to exert their rights to free speech above good taste and considerations of consequences. Profit, greed, willfulness, trump discretion. Why do they make that movie in the first place? How is it not different from making fun of color or gender or physical handicap. The pc cops talk about sensitivity all the time, but only work on limited issues. Hollywood exports bad taste to the world. It has no regulations under the Guise of Free Speech, nor does it self regulates. This industry makes obsene money and politicians pander to them, maily the left. A home made video about Mohammed had mobilized the president, the Secretary of State and his cabinet to stand up to condemn the maker because it is "insensitive". Nobody consider this Sony movie insensitive, It is ironic that it takes evil action to bring major players to their knees, not common sense, not a pursuit of decency. The mail drop to Korea would be arrogance, insensitivity, and stupidity (should it be consequential) on steroid. Ask the men who were in captivity in North Korea. It is no laughing matter.
It takes courage and backbone for Ron Hosko to have written this letter to the presidenet. He is in a appropriate position to speak up with his experience and knowledge about law enforcement and justice. I am just worried about the vindictive attitude Obama, Holder, and his aids have against anyone who speaks against him and what action they might take on him. But bravo for the courage, Mr. Hosko.
In response to:

You Can't Keep a Good Myth Down

PCL Wrote: Oct 02, 2014 6:08 PM
You are all about "I", "me", "my". You helped to keep Obama and his enablers in position. Is he not bad enough? Romney may not be your ideal candidate, but be honest, he would have been 100% better than what we have. Look at the incompetent and opportunistic staff he has/had: Sebellius, Holder, Shinseki, the female clowns at the State, IRS diretor, Lerner, Secret Service director, his goofy VP,...........Constitution adherence? Look at the way he uses executive orders, look at how he divides the country, look at how he deals with foreign policy..... There is no perfect politician, but choose one that does less harm. Are you happy now?
He does not like his job; but he likes his phone and pen. How can he golf when the world is upside down with troubles???
1 - 10 Next