In response to:

Sandra Fluke: Opposing the Contraception Mandate Is Just Like Opposing Leukemia Coverage

pbergen Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 3:12 PM
she is the essence of liberalism, being not responsible for her actions. she wants to have sexual relations but wants others to pay for her birth control. need i say more.
traitorbill Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 4:19 PM
That's what the government is there for. Insurance for poor decisions. Government is a moral hazard.
Incredulous2 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 10:19 PM
Though a moral hazard, as you so correctly identify it traitorbill, it can nevertheless be so much more moral in electing to office those of "good" character.
Sadly, and tragically, just look at who all those Dem/Prog/Lib cabal members are, and what states and locales they come from. It shows a very crisp division between good and evil.

On MSNBC this afternoon, Sandra Fluke truly outdid herself, attempting to argue that the people who disagree with the contraception mandate on religious freedom grounds are in the same category as people who oppose insurance coverage for leukemia. Just...watch:

What's important to note is that some of the folks who are continuing to object to this policy are actually worried about employers who are private companies, not religiously affiliated employers in any way, but the boss has a particular religious concern, and they want to be able to deny...